TABLE 6.
Predictors |
JE |
Predictors |
JE |
||
b | 95% CI1 | b | 95% CI | ||
Dependent variables | |||||
I-Mot | 3.53 | [2.21, 4.86]*** | E-Mot | 1.95 | [1.41, 2.50]*** |
Worker status2 | 7.20 | [3.79, 10.60]*** | Worker status | 3.90 | [2.12, 5.68]*** |
Country3 | 7.72 | [4.30, 11.42]*** | Country | 2.82 | [1.10, 4.55]** |
INT1 (Mot × Status) | –1.43 | [−2.19, −0.68]*** | INT1 | –0.78 | [−1.14, −0.42]*** |
INT2 (Mot × Country) | –1.50 | [−2.39, −0.62]*** | INT2 | –0.54 | [−0.90, −0.17]** |
INT3 (Status × Country) | –3.81 | [−5.94, −1.69]*** | INT3 | –1.82 | [−2.97, −0.68]** |
INT4 (Mot × Status × Country) | 0.78 | [0.26, 1.30]** | INT4 | 0.36 | [0.12, 0.60]** |
Control variables | |||||
Gender | 0.20 | [−0.01, 0.40] | 0.07 | [−0.09, 0.23] | |
Age | –0.01 | [−0.03, 0.01] | –0.02 | [−0.03, −0.01]** | |
Marital status | –0.17 | [−0.41, 0.06] | –0.22 | [−0.40, −0.04]* | |
Number of children | 0.01 | [−0.11, 0.09] | 0.05 | [−0.02, 0.13] | |
Tenure | –0.01 | [−0.03, 0.01] | –0.01 | [−0.03, −0.01]* | |
Job position | 0.42 | [0.18, 0.65]*** | 0.33 | [0.16, 0.51]*** |
*p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001. DV, dependent variable. JE, job engagement. Mot, motivation. I-Mot, intrinsic motivation. E-Mot, extrinsic motivation. INT, interaction effect. 195% CI with 5,000 resampling via bias-corrected bootstrapping. 2Worker status (1 = working student, 2 = non-student employee). 3Country (1 = Israel, 2 = Japan).