Skip to main content
. 2020 Feb 27;10:3621. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-59916-1

Table 1.

Comparison of epidemiological characteristics between endometrial carcinoma patients with or without leiomyomas, adenomyosis or endometriosis.

Characteristic EC patients without Leiomyomas (n = 582) EC patients with Leiomyomas (n = 817) bP EC patients without adenomyosis (n = 827) EC patients with adenomyosis (n = 572) bP EC Patients without endometriosis (n = 1220) EC patients with endometriosis (n = 179) bP
aN (%) aN (%) aN (%) aN. (%) aN (%) aN (%)
Mean age at EC diagnosis (range) 60.7 (26.4–80.0) 61.6 (28.9–80.0) 0.02 61.6 (26.4–80.0) 60.8 (31.9–80.0) 0.2 61.9 (26.4–80.0) 57.0 (28.9–78.9) 5.0 × 10−11
Body Mass Index
<25 138 (23.8) 209 (25.6) 211 (25.7) 136 (23.8) 292 (24.1) 55 (30.7)
25–29.9 153 (26.4) 202 (24.8) 225 (27.4) 130 (22.8) 311 (25.6) 44 (24.6)
≥30 289 (49.8) 401 (49.2) 0.6 385 (46.9) 305 (53.4) 0.05 610 (50.3) 80 (44.7) 0.03
Oral Contraceptive use
never 198 (34.0) 258 (31.6) 307 (37.1) 149 (26.1) 402 (33.0) 54 (30.2)
ever 384 (66.0) 558 (68.4) 0.4 520 (62.9) 422 (73.9) 6.6 × 10−5 817 (67.0) 125 (69.8) 0.3
Parity
0 89 (15.3) 158 (19.3) 182 (22.0) 65 (11.4) 205 (16.8) 42 (23.5)
1 64 (11.0) 76 (9.3) 86 (10.4) 54 (9.4) 112 (9.2) 28 (15.6)
≥2 429 (73.7) 583 (71.4) 0.01 559 (67.6) 453 (79.2) 1.9 × 10−9 903 (74.0) 109 (60.9) 0.07
Age at Menarche
≤11 108 (18.8) 206 (25.4) 180 (21.9) 134 (23.7) 272 (22.5) 42 (23.5)
12–13 284 (49.4) 382 (47.1) 398 (48.5) 268 (47.4) 577 (47.8) 89 (49.7)
≥14 183 (31.8) 223 (27.5) 0.004 243 (29.6) 163 (28.8) 0.9 358 (29.7) 48 (26.8) 1
Smoking
never 369 (63.5) 539 (66.0) 523 (63.3) 385 (67.3) 792 (65.0) 116 (64.8)
ever 212 (36.5) 278 (34.0) 0.6 303 (36.7) 187 (32.7) 0.1 427 (35.0) 63 (35.2) 0.7
cFamily History any cancer (FDR &/or SDR)
no 213 (36.6) 285 (34.9) 295 (35.7) 203 (35.5) 445 (36.5) 53 (29.6)
yes 369 (63.4) 532 (65.1) 0.6 532 (64.3) 369 (64.5) 0.9 775 (63.5) 126 (70.4) 0.06

EC, endometrial carcinoma; FDR, first-degree relative, SDR, second-degree relative.

aNs may not sum to the total because of missing or unknown data; proportions (%) sum to 100% of observations with data available and excludes missing/unknowns.

bP-values are from logistic models comparing presence of a condition versus not; models are adjusted for age at EC diagnosis and presence of the other two gynecologic conditions; p-values for BMI, Parity and age at menarche represent trend across ordered groups.

cFamily history of cancer reported in at least one FDR or SDR.