Skip to main content
. 2019 Nov 19;10(1):17–41. doi: 10.1007/s13534-019-00134-8

Table 5.

A summary of the studies relevant to the evaluation of electrochemical impedance spectroscopy for assessment of bone quality, osseointegration, and infection

Assessment References Experimental system Electrode configuration Material Duration Primary result
Bone quality Schaur et al. [117] Ex vivo calf femur 2 electrode Not specified N/A Position dependent change in impedance based on tissue type
Teichmann et al. [125] Ex vivo calf femur 2 electrode Gold N/A Detect differences in bone quality during craniotomy
Balmer et al. [126] In vivo sheep model 2 electrode 304 stainless steel In situ Distance and bone quality between electrodes effects impedance measurement
Collins et al. [127] In vivo canine model 3 electrode Titanium cathode 12 weeks Cathodic stimulation did not increase impedance around the cathode
Gupta et al. [128] In vivo human trial 2 electrode Steel ex fix pins 8 weeks Mean increase in impedance increase with healing time, sharp increase with union
Lin et al. [129] In vivo mouse model 2 electrode Gold and platinum interdigitated electrode array 0–28 days and 0–26 days Measure time course of nonunion fracture healing with implantable microdevice
Kozhevnikov et al. [130] In vivo rabbit model 2 electrode Ag/AgCl 12 weeks EIS monitored the healing of bone CSD over 12 weeks with bone scaffold treatment
Osseointegration Clemente et al. [124] Human in vivo trial 3 electrode Titanium (working electrode), silver (reference electrode) 90 days Osseointegration corresponds to an increase in impedance, while clinical complications can cause a decrease in impedance during the healing process
Fox et al. [131] In vivo baboon tibia model 3 electrode Titanium (working electrode), silver (reference electrode) 1 h No short term changes in impedance during implantation
Cosoli et al. [132] In vivo human dental implant 2 electrode Titanium implant, stainless steel electrode In situ Determine difference between healthy, inflamed, and infected dental implants with EIS
Duan et al. [133] In vivo cat model 2 electrode Platinum band electrode 60 days Impedance increase with 6 month implantation time
Arpaia et al. [134] Ex vivo cow femur 2 electrode Titanium screw electrodes N/A Number of screw cycles decreased bone/electrode contact, which decreased impedance
Infection Farrow et al. [138] In vitro simulated wound fluid 2 electrode Ag/AgCl 16 h Impedance normalization is a useful technique for monitoring bacterial attachment
Ward et al. [136] In vitro simulated wound fluid 2 electrode Screen printed carbon 24 h Normalized phase angle can determine presence of P. aeruginosa, and distinguish between mucoid and non-mucoid strains
Kim et al. [140] In vitro simulated wound fluid 2 electrode Gold interdigitated electrode array 1 h Bacterial attachment decreased capacitance in interdigitated electrode array; single frequency can be used in real time
Paredes et al. [141] 96 well plate 2 electrode Gold interdigitated electrode array 24 h Biofilm formation causes 35% increase in resistance after a few hours
Paredes et al. [142] In vitro venous catheter phantom 2 electrode Gold interdigitated electrode array 48 h 55% maximum change in impedance parameters after 10 h
Hoyos-Nogués et al. [146] In vitro 2 electrode Antimicrobial peptide functionalized interdigitated electrode array 5 h Linear increase in resistance to S. sanguinis in artificial saliva
Ahmed et al. [147] In vitro 2 electrode Antibody functionalized gold interdigitated electrode array 30 min Sensitive detection of S. pyogenes