Skip to main content
. 2020 Jan 7;6(1):e001121. doi: 10.1136/rmdopen-2019-001121

Table 3.

All identified barriers and facilitators to SDM*, grouped according to six levels of the healthcare system12

Levels Barriers Facilitators
The innovation itself SDM takes too much time
There are not always two or more equivalent treatment options available
Sometimes decisions are urgent and have to be made right away
SDM causes patients to question the expertise of healthcare professionals (nurses only)
SDM causes patients distress or discomfort
SDM saves time in the long run (physicians only)
SDM fulfils the ethical imperative of respecting patient autonomy
SDM is appropriate regardless of the type of rheumatic disease or decision
SDM benefits the professional relationship with patients (physicians only)
SDM improves patients’ treatment adherence
Ultimately, SDM improves health outcomes
The individual professional Healthcare professionals lack knowledge of what SDM entails
Healthcare professionals do not exactly know how to apply SDM
Healthcare professionals fall back into routines (ie, they forget to apply SDM)
There is a lack of motivation among healthcare professionals to change routines
Healthcare professionals lack knowledge of treatment options
Healthcare professionals lack communication skills
Healthcare professionals do not want to stray away from what they believe is the best decision
There are many other things demanding the attention of healthcare professionals
Healthcare professionals have a (very) positive attitude toward SDM
Healthcare professionals feel confident to apply SDM
Healthcare professionals have hands-on experience with SDM
Healthcare professionals try to imagine themselves in their patients’ shoes
There are education programme on SDM available
There are communication skills training programme available
The patient Patients do not prefer to be involved in decision making
SDM is often too complex for patients (ie, patients are not able to take an active role)
Patients lack knowledge of treatment options
Patients’ treatment preferences are at odds with those of healthcare professionals
Sometimes there are communication issues (eg, language barriers)
Patients are well-prepared for consultations
There is patient information on treatment options available (eg, leaflets, booklets and websites)
The social context The inter-professional collaboration is inadequate (eg, poor communication between physicians and nurses) (nurses only)
Colleagues are not supportive (nurses only)
Physicians and nurses collaborate successfully with each other
There is a supportive team culture
The organisational context SDM is incompatible with clinical practice guidelines
There is not enough time to apply SDM (ie, consultation times are too short)
The workflow does not allow SDM to be easily implemented (eg, poor logistics) (nurses only)
There is a lack of tools that support the application of SDM (eg, decision aids)
Consultation times are long enough to apply SDM
The economic and political context There is a lack of reimbursement for SDM (physicians only)
Some treatment options are expensive (physicians only)
SDM is an important topic in the Dutch healthcare system

*Barriers and facilitators were experienbed by both physicians and nurses, unless indicated otherwise.

SDM, shared decision making.