Skip to main content
. 2020 Feb 17;34(2):156–162. doi: 10.1089/end.2019.0419

Table 3.

Primary Outcomes for Patients Undergoing Ureteroscopy: Multivariate Analysis

Outcomea Ureteroscopy
Estimated difference (β) (95% CI) p
HP (n = 26) AIP (n = 25)
Pump setup time 3.7 ± 1.1 2.3 ± 1.2   −1.67 (−2.4 to −1.0) <0.001b
Outcomec HP (n = 26)d AIP (n = 25) Estimated odds ratio (95% CI) p
Pump maintenance time
 <1 minute 7 (26.9%) 20 (80.0%) 15.8 (3.3 to 73.7) <0.001b
 ≥1 minutes 19 (73.1%) 5 (20.0%)
Total pump time
 <5 minutes 9 (36%) 22 (88%) 25.8 (4.0 to 165.4) <0.001b
 ≥5 minutes 16 (64%) 3 (12%)
Intraoperative irrigation-related concerns
 None 2 (7.6%) 11 (44.0%) 6.9 (1.2 to 40.4) 0.03
 One or more 24 (92.4%) 14 (56.0%)
Surgeon satisfactione
 Favorable (8–10/10) 19 (73.1%) 20 (80.0%) 1.6 (0.4 to 6.7) 0.60
 Unfavorable (0–7/10) 7 (26.9%) 5 (20.0%)
Nurse satisfactione
 Favorable (8–10/10) 11 (42.3%) 23 (92.0%) 25.4 (4.1 to 164.0) <0.001b
 Unfavorable (0–7/10) 15 (57.7%) 2 (8.0%)
a

Linear regression used for analysis (normally distributed data).

b

Alpha <0.01 considered statistically significant after adjustment with Bonferroni correction, given comparison of five outcome variables.

c

Logistic regression used for analysis (data not normally distributed).

d

Twenty-five patients included for pump maintenance time and total pump time.

e

Irrigation satisfaction scoring: 1 = highly dissatisfied to 10 = highly satisfied.

CI = confidence interval.