Skip to main content
. 2020 Feb 21;11:273. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2020.00273

TABLE 2.

Statistically significant differences in relative abundance of gut microbiota at the genus level between the DJB-sa group and the SHAM group (8 weeks post-surgery).

Relative abundance (%) DJB-sa Group SHAM Group p-value
Anaerotruncus 0.268088 ± 0.103935 0.429496 ± 0.095664 *
Bifidobacterium 2.36345 ± 3.12068 0.031067 ± 0.044802 **
Candidatus_Stoquefichus 0.002748 ± 0.006144 0.103781 ± 0.142999 *
Coriobacteriaceae_UCG_002 0.171566 ± 0.225374 0 ± 0 **
Corynebacterium_1 0 ± 0 0.022368 ± 0.033062 *
Enterococcus 0.210766 ± 0.164387 0.015741 ± 0.02641 *
Erysipelatoclostridium 0.048005 ± 0.045587 0.237916 ± 0.098302 *
Escherichia_Shigella 7.170672 ± 4.076723 0.128414 ± 0.203286 **
Eubacterium_oxidoreducens_group 0.031736 ± 0.016755 0.075911 ± 0.031803 **
Eubacterium_xylanophilum_group 0.276446 ± 0.132526 0.652306 ± 0.166386 *
Faecalibaculum 0.239382 ± 0.158532 0.019082 ± 0.008937 **
Intestinibacter 0.003625 ± 0.004127 0.012658 ± 0.005435 *
Lachnospiraceae_ND3007_group 0.107005 ± 0.165109 0.811791 ± 0.774009 *
Lachnospiraceae_NK4B4_group 0.195915 ± 0.189627 0.021653 ± 0.042321 *
Oscillospira 0.000471 ± 0.001054 0.03277 ± 0.04081 *
Paeniclostridium 0.501956 ± 0.394156 0.000589 ± 0.001316 *
Ruminococcaceae_UCG_010 0.140191 ± 0.076948 0.401195 ± 0.263155 *
Staphylococcus 0.002956 ± 0.002514 0.075949 ± 0.092133 *
Subdoligranulum 0.087656 ± 0.054237 0.212553 ± 0.0728 *

*P < 0.05, **P < 0.01.