Skip to main content
. 2020 Jan 20;2(2):100067. doi: 10.1016/j.jhepr.2020.100067

Table 2.

Limitations of current non-invasive serum and imaging tests.

Type of limitation Serum biomarkers Transient elastography (VCTE) Shear wave elastography MRE
Technical limitations Not Liver specific Requires training and experience for validated quality criteria
No B-mode image and unable to select liver region of interest
Requires dedicated US training
Quality criteria not yet validated
Unable to compare reported parameters of shear wave speed (range 0.5–4.4 m/s) or Young's modulus (2–150 kPa) between US devices, VCTE, or MRE
Requires specialised technician or radiologist
Discrimination of adjacent fibrosis stages No No No No
Performance for intermediate fibrosis stage Poor Overlapping LSM range Limited data Overlapping LSM range
Cost and availability Patented marker panels not readily available and costly Not widely reimbursed
Access concerns in resource limited practices
Not readily available outside specialised centres Costly
Not available outside dedicated radiology centres
False positivity Haemolysis, Gilbert's disease, cholestasis, immune thrombocytopenia, inflammation, age, exercise, non-fasting Acute hepatitis, inflammation, non-fasting, exercise, hepatic venous congestion, inflammation or infiltration, alcohol excess, cholestasis, steatosis, portal vein thrombosis Left vs. Right hepatic lobe, acute hepatitis, hepatic inflammation or infiltration, non-fasting, exercise, right heart failure, extrahepatic cholestasis, breathing cycle (end-expiration vs. end-inspiration) Inflammation, cholestasis, hepatic venous congestion, postprandial state, and right heart failure
Failure Indeterminate “grey zone” scores in 30-50% for simple markers (NFS, APRI, FIB-4) Higher failure rates than serum tests: operator inexperience, narrow intercostal space, body habitus, ascites Higher failure rates than serum tests: BMI, tissue depth >2–3 cm below skin surface Higher failure than serum tests: waist circumference/BMI, claustrophobia, iron deposition, massive ascites, higher field strength (3 T vs. 1.5 T)
Thresholds Variable for simple markers across aetiologies Variable across aetiologies Not validated across aetiologies Vary between gradient-recalled echo vs. echo planar imaging, 2D vs. 3D acquisition, 40 vs. 60 Hz, and across aetiologies
Differentiation between simple steatosis and NASH No No No No
Follow-up of dynamic fibrosis changes No No No No

APRI, AST-platelet ratio index; AST, aspartate aminotransferase; BMI, body mass index; CLD, chronic liver disease; FIB-4, fibrosis-4; LSM, liver stiffness measurement; MRE, Magnetic resonance elastography; NAFLD, non-alcoholic fatty liver disease; NFS, NAFLD fibrosis score; US, ultrasound; VCTE, vibration-controlled transient elastography.