Skip to main content
. 2020 Feb 28;2020(2):CD001168. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001168.pub3

Lodi 2007.

Methods Study design: RCT
Conducted in Italy
Number of centres: 1
Recruitment period: May 2002 to January 2003                 
Funding source: University of Milan
Participants Inclusion criteria: clinical and histological diagnosis of OLP; symptomatic form of the disease; aged > 18 years
Exclusion criteria: previous treatment for OLP; systemic or local treatment with antifungal or corticosteroids in the 6 months prior to study; hypersensitivity to clobetasol propionate or miconazole; or uncontrolled diabetes or hypertension, systemic conditions that could hamper participation and compliance with the study
Group A: randomised 18; analysed 15
Group B: randomised 17; analysed 15
Interventions Group A: clobetasol propionate gel 0.05% (twice daily) and miconazole 2% gel (once daily) for 6 weeks
Group B: clobetasol propionate gel 0.05% (twice daily) and placebo gel (once daily) for 6 weeks
Outcomes Pain (VAS), percentage of mucosa affected, adverse effects
Notes  
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Low risk Quote: "allocation sequence was generated using software available online."
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Low risk Quote: "sequence was hidden from the researchers determining patient eligibility."
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) 
 All outcomes Low risk Quote: "Neither the patient nor the clinician was aware of the content of the syringes."
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) 
 All outcomes Low risk Quote: "Neither the patient nor the clinician was aware of the content of the syringes."
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) 
 All outcomes Low risk Comment: missing data balanced in numbers across intervention groups (3 and 2) and not likely to have a clinically relevant impact on the intervention effect estimate. Unlikely to have introduced bias.
Selective reporting (reporting bias) Low risk Planned outcomes reported.
Other bias Low risk No other sources of bias identified.