Skip to main content
. 2020 Feb 12;33(1):e100149. doi: 10.1136/gpsych-2019-100149

Table 2.

Characteristics of reproducibility in psychiatry studies

Characteristics Variables
N (%) 95% CI
Funding*
(n=296)
University 14 (4.73)
Hospital 2 (0.68)
Public 72 (24.3)
Private/Industry 16 (5.41)
Non-profit 3 (1.01)
Mixed 46 (15.54)
No statement listed 111 (37.5)
No funding received 32 (10.81)
Conflict of interest statement
(n=296)
Statement, one or more conflicts of interest 31 (10.47) 7 to 13.9
Statement, no conflict of interest 146 (49.32) 43.7 to 55
No conflict of interest statement 119 (40.2) 34.7 to 45.8
Data availability
(n=211)
Statement, some data are available 14 (6.64) 3.8 to 6.6
Statement, data are not available 0 (0) 0 to 0
No data availability statement 197 (93.36) 90.5 to 93.4
Material availability
(n=185)
Statement, some materials are available 22 (11.89) 8.2 to 15.6
Statement, materials are not available 0 (0) 0 to 0
No materials availability statement 163 (88.11) 84.4 to 91.8
Protocol available
(n=211)
Full protocol 4 (1.90) 0.4 to 3.4
No protocol 207 (98.10) 96.6 to 99.6
Analysis scripts
(n=211)
Statement, some analysis scripts area available 1 (0.47) 0 to 1.3
Statement, analysis scripts are not available 0 (0) 0 to 0
No analysis script availability statement 210 (99.53) 98.7 to 100
Replication studies
(n=211)
Reports a replication or novel study 4 (1.90) 0.4 to 3.4
Does not report replication or novel study 207 (98.10) 96.6 to 99.6
Cited by meta-analysis or systematic review†
(n=185)
No citations 119 (59.20) 53.6 to 64.8
A single citation 39 (19.40) 14.9 to 23.9
One–five citations 39 (19.40) 14.9 to 23.9
Greater than five citations 4 (2.00) 0.4 to 3.6
Preregistration
(n=211)
Statement, says was preregistration 13 (6.16) 3.4 to 8.9
Statement, was not preregistration 0 (0) 0 to 0
No, there is no preregistration statement 198 (93.84) 91.1 to 96.6

*Some studies included multiple funding sources.

†No studies were explicitly excluded from the systematic reviews that cited the original article.