Skip to main content
. 2002 Oct 21;2002(4):CD003902. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003902

Fink 1994.

Methods 1) Randomisation: not described. 
 2) Allocation concealment: not described.
 3) Masking: Double blind, using identical placebo tablets to active treatment. 
 4) Withdraw/Drop‐out: none.
 5) Duration of intervention: 1 month.
 6) Design: Cross‐over groups
 7) Jadad quality Score: 2
 8) Location: Tel Aviv, Israel
Participants 1) Inclusion criteria:COPD, severe, stable, smokers or former smokers.
 2) Definition of COPD: FEV1 less than 50% of predicted.
 3)Type of exercise test: Incremental cycle‐ergometer. 
 4) Definition of stable COPD: not described.
 5) Age: Mean = 68.5, SD 3.3 years
 6) FEV1: Mean = 38.3, SD 8.6 (% pred) and Mean = 1.06, SD 2.8 (L)
 7) Number of patients: 22 ( 17 men and 5 women), withdraw: 0
 8) Baseline therapy: Inhalation corticosteroids and other bronchodilators.
 9) Exclusion criteria: known cardiac disease or cardiac disorders shown on the baseline incremental exercise test.
Interventions THEOPHYLLINE GROUP (n = 22, completed the study)
 1) Drug: Theophylline (Theotrim, Trima Lab., Israel)
 2) Short or long action: Long‐action
 3) Dose: 300 mg theophylline (twice daily). Patients weighing less than 60 Kg took 200 mg twice per day. 
 4) Washout period: 2 weeks.
 5) Theophylline blood level: measured on the day of the initial baseline study and after the first week of treatment. The dose was adjusted if the level was below 55.5umol/l. This adjustment was repeated until all patients had a blood level above 55.5umol/l.
PLACEBO GROUP ( n = 22, completed the study )
Outcomes 1) Pulmonary function tests FVC (L), FVC (% pred), FEV1 (L), FEV1 (% pred). 
 2) Exercise testing (incremental exercise cycle ergometer test ‐ WR, VO2max, HR, respiratory rate and ventilation, VO2max/HR (maximum oxygen pulse), VEmax/MVV (dyspnoea index), anaerobic threshold (VE/VO2slope).
 3) Resting arterial blood gases
 4) Maximal voluntary ventilation (MVV) (L), MVV (% pred).
 5) Side effects: not described.
Notes 1) Intention‐to‐treat analyses: Yes
 2) Sample size and statistical power: not reported.
 3) Representativity: not described.
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Unclear risk B ‐ Unclear