Skip to main content
. 2002 Oct 21;2002(4):CD003902. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003902
Study Reason for exclusion
Adelroth 1998 Review article.
Arnold 1990 No placebo arm. Study compared enprofylline versus theophylline.
Ashutosh 1997 The objective of this study was to observe the effect theophylline on respiratory drive. The study was also only of single doses of theophylline.
Bachmann 1995 All patients were taking theophylline as study was seeing the effects of cimetidine and famotidine on theophylline.
Berry 1991 Because of the objective of this study is investigate the effect to theophylline on sleep‐disordered breathing in patients with COPD.
Beulcke 1995 No placebo arm. Study compared two derivatives of xanthine.
Bleecker 1991 Single dose study lasting 2 hours and probably not an RCT.
Blom 1985 Study did not involve the use of theophylline.
Boos 1989 No placebo arm in study.
Carvalho‐Pinto 1991 No placebo arm in study.
Chapman 1990 The population studied had reversible obstructive airway disease (asthma)
Conradson 1987 The population studied have bronchial asthma (23) and/or chronic bronchitis (1).
Crimi 1995 No placebo arm in study. Comparison was between nedocromil sodium and theophylline.
Cusack 1986 No placebo arm in study.
Di Lorenzo 1998 There is no control group, only salmeterol and theophylline intervention groups.
Dini 2001 Not an RCT.
Dorow 1978 Allocation of treatment not randomised, although double‐blinding was used.
Dull 1981 This study presents data for post isoproterenol nebulisation response on the final day of 4‐wk placebo and theophylline period.
Evans 1984 Single dose study. Patients were given theophylline at 2200hrs on the eve of each study day and all patients were studies 12 hours later. Varying single doses were used (200, 400, 600 and 800 mg) on separate days.
Fitzpatrick 1992 The subjects included in this study are healthy volunteeers
Greening 1981 The population is not COPD. They have asthma.
Harkaway 1985 No placebo arm, study comparing 2 preparations of theophylline.
Horiguchi 1999 Not COPD but study done in patients with asthma.
Hudson 1973 No placebo arm in study.
Javaheri 1996 The population studied in this paper have heart failure not COPD
Karpel 1994 There are four grops in this study : ipratropium + theophylline + albuterol vs theophylline + albuterol vs ipratropium vs placebo. But there are no theophylline only group.
Lamont 1982 Study included patients with greater than 20% reversibility in FEV1 after beta2 agonists from pMDI, therefore COPD patients only not included in study.
Lefcoe 1982 Because of the distribution of the grous: P = placebos (2 oral, plus one aerosol), F + T = fenoterol + teophylline, I = Ipratropium bromide + placebo + theophylline, F+ T + I = fenoterol+ theophylline + ipratropium bromide. So, there is not a isolated theophylline study group.
Leitch 1981 Single dose study lasting 3 hours.
Leuenberger 1997 Not an RCT but a review paper.
Lunell 1983 No placebo arm in study.
Mahon 1999 This was not a conventional RCT but an N of 1 trial, therefore it was excluded as only conventional RCT's were included. Patients in this study switched (crossover) to the "other" blinded treatment arm if the first treatment did not appear to work.
Man 1996 No placebo arm in study.
Marlin 1978 Not COPD patients.
Martin 1992 No placebo group in study.
McHardy 1981 Study specifically looked at chronic bronchitis patients only but also included some patients who had COPD. But the data for COPD patients is not presented separately but mentioned in text.
Melani 1994 There is no placebo group in this study.
Melillo 1989 There is no control group.
Morandini 1989 No placebo arm in study.
Oren 1997 This study is not randomised.
Poukkula 1989 Not patients with COPD.
Pulido 1989 Bamyphylline is a theophylline derivate. Our protocol includes only aminophylline and theophylline not their derivates.
Sacco 1995 In this study there was no placebo group. It was doxofylline versus theophylline groups.
Shivaram 1997 Single dose study lasting 120 minutes.
Siemon 1991 Study comparing two different theophylline preparations.
Steen 1980 No placebo arm in study. Tedral versus theophylline only.
Sutton 1981 Not COPD patients.
Svedmyr 1982 Single dose study in patients with asthma. Oral theophylline used in combination with terbutaline.
Taccola 1999 No placebo arm.
Tanzj 1974 Two different theophylline preparations compared with no placebo arm in study.
Tatsis 1988 This study does not a placebo group and includes bronchial asthmatics patients
Taylor 1985 Not COPD patients, mean bronchodilator reversibility in FEV1 of > 26%.
Tsukino 1998 Single dose study.
Umut 1992 Not an RCT.
Van Andel 1999 Not a RCT.
Vereen 1986 Use of iv aminophylline preparation.
Villani 1997 Because doxophylline is a theophylline derivate. Our protocol includes only aminophylline and theophylline.
Vyse 1989 No placebo group.
Wiessmann 1975 Allocation of treatment not randomised, although double‐blinding was used.
Winter 1984 No placebo arm. Study only included a comparison between theophylline versus salbutamol.
Yang 2001 Not COPD patients but asthma.
ZuWallack 2001 Study was primarily comparing theophylline plus salmeterol as a combination treatment. Although the study had theophylline only arm it did not have a placebo only arm so the study cannot be included in the review.