Skip to main content
. 2019 Nov 6;6(12):ofz468. doi: 10.1093/ofid/ofz468

Table 2.

Association Between SHBG Levels and NAFLD

Model 1a Model 1a + Visceral Adiposity Model 1a + Visceral Adiposity + HOMA-IR
Odds Ratio (95% CI) P Odds Ratio (95% CI) P Odds Ratio (95% CI) P
Log2 (SHBG) 0.38 (0.26–0.56) <.001 0.50 (0.33–0.77) .001 0.52 (0.34–0.80) .003
Log2 (TT) 0.75 (0.53–1.07) .12 0.87 (0.60–1.25) .44 0.93 (0.63–1.36) .70
HIV infection 0.93 (0.55–1.58) .80 0.65 (0.37–1.15) .14 0.61 (0.34–1.09) .10
VAT (per 10 mm2) 1.07 (1.04–1.11) <.001 1.05 (1.02–1.09) .002
Ln (HOMA-IR) 1.91 (1.17–3.11) .01
Age (per year) 1.00 (0.96–1.04) .82 0.97 (0.93–1.01) .14 0.97 (0.93–1.01) .13
Black race 0.26 (0.12–0.54) <.001 0.42 (0.19–0.92) .03 0.34 (0.15–0.77) .01
PNPLA3 non-CC 1.81 (1.10–2.98) .02 2.03 (1.20–3.41) .01 2.17 (1.28–3.68) .004

Bold formatting signifies statistical significance at P < .05.

Abbreviations: CI, confidence interval; HOMA-IR, homeostatic model assessment of insulin resistance; NAFLD, nonalcoholic fatty liver disease; SHBG, sex hormone–binding globulin; TT, total testosterone; VAT, visceral adipose tissue.

aAlso adjusted for MACS sites and test batch.