Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 Feb 28.
Published in final edited form as: Nephrol Nurs J. 2019 Sep-Oct;46(5):497–508.

Table 3.

Factors Associated with Fatigue

Author/Year Number of Participants Body Mass Index Co-morbidities Physical Activity Depression Social Support Sleep Education Level Design Fatigue Measure Strengths Weaknesses
Ali & Taha, 2017 105 N/A N/A N/A No N/A Yes (sleep latency – ↑ fatigue) No Descriptive

Cross-sectional
Fatigue Severity Scale Large sample size of patients on HD Cross-sectional
Bai et al., 2015 193 N/A No Yes – (↓) Depression – (↑) Yes (No spouse – ↑ fatigue) N/A N/A Descriptive Correlational Fatigue Scale for hemodialysis patients Participants recruited from six HD centers Cross-sectional
Bossola, Luciani, & Tazza, 2009 62 N/A Yes – (↑) N/A Depression – (↑) N/A N/A N/A Cross-sectional SF-36 Comparison of fatigue and non-fatigued participants on HD Limited sample size

Cross-sectional
Bossola, Stasio, Antocicco, & Tazza, 2013 68 Yes – (↓) Yes – (↓) N/A Depression – (↓) N/A N/A N/A Cross-sectional Six Yes or No questions based Hardy and Studenski model None of the patients on HD were on antidepressants Dichotomous fatigue measure

Limited sample size

Cross-sectional
Chilcot et al., 2015 174 Yes – (↑) Yes – (↑) Yes – (↓) N/A No (marital status does not impact fatigue) N/A N/A Cross-sectional Chalder Fatigue Questionnaire (primary outcome)
The Work and Social Adjustment Scale (secondary outcome)
Measured fatigue severity and fatigue related functional impairment in individuals on HD Cross-sectional
Jhamb et al., 2009 917 (705 included in adjusted models) Yes – (↑) Yes – (↑) Yes – (↓) N/A N/A Yes (↓) N/A Longitudinal SF-36 vitality scale Large sample size

Included patients on HD and PD

Longitudinal
Fatigue was only measured at baseline and 1 year on dialysis through vitality scores
Karadag,Kilic, & Metin, 2013 73 N/A N/A N/A N/A Social support – ↓ fatigue N/A N/A Descriptive

Cross-sectional
Fatigue Severity Scale Compared association of fatigue in individuals on HD with support from family, friends, special person, and overall Cross-sectional

Correlational analysis determined relationship between fatigue, effects may be bidirectional
Liu, 2006 119 N/A N/A N/A Depression – (↓) N/A N/A No Cross-sectional

Correlational
Fatigue Assess Scale Large sample size of individuals on HD All patients were married

Cross-sectional
Wang et al., 2016 345 No Yes Yes – (↑) N/A No N/A No Cross-sectional FACIT-Fatigue Participants recruited from two HD centers

Large sample size
Cross-sectional

Only examined a few potential variables for fatigue
Zyga et al., 2015 129 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Yes – education Cross-sectional Fatigue Assessment Scale Participants recruited from two HD centers

Large sample size
Cross-sectional

Physicians, nurses, and other health care providers were present during survey administration