Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 Feb 28.
Published in final edited form as: Cytometry B Clin Cytom. 2010;78(Suppl 1):S91–S97. doi: 10.1002/cyto.b.20550

Table 2.

Malignant transformation in patients with IgM MGUS

Author No. with IgM MGUS Median follow-up No. progressing to WM (%) Median time to progression # other LPD
All MGUS
 Cesana (22) 130 67 mo 12 (9.2) 89 mo *
 Blade (31) 14 56 mo 1 (7.1) n.r.
 Anagnostopoulos (37) 4 71 mo 0 (0.0) n.a.
 Colls (52) 3 4 yrs 2 (66.7) 3 yrs
 van de Donk (53) 9 6.75 yrs 1 (11.1) 9.46 yrs
 Veneri (54) 71 67 mo 8 (11.3) n.r.
IgM MGUS
 Kyle (3) 213 6.3 yrs 6 (2.8) > 5 yrs** 17 NHL, 3 CLL, 3 AL, 1 MM***
 Montoto (55) 52 5 yrs 5 (9.6) 3.6 yrs 1 NHL
 Baldini (56) 217 56.1 mo 13 (6.0) n.r. 2 NHL
 Morra (57) 452**** 49 mo 36 (8.0) 53 mo 2 NHL, 1 CLL, 1 AL, 1 MM

Abbreviations: MGUS, monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance; No., number; mo, months; yrs, years; n.r., not reported; n.a., not applicable

*

Cannot be determined from the data

**

For 5 of 6 patients

***

Patient developed a biclonal IgM/IgA gammopathy and subsequently developed IgA myeloma.

****

Included patients with asymptomatic IgM monoclonal gammopathy