Table 2.
Comparison of Major Funder Definitions of Engaged Research
CIHR | PCORI | NIHR | NHMRC | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Who | ||||
Who does research engagement involve? | ||||
Patients as partners required for definition? | Yes | No | Yes | No |
Patients as partners part of definition? | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
Other stakeholders referenced? | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
Why | ||||
Is rationale for definition expressed in terms of social action/equity? | Yes | No | Yes | No |
What are goals of research engagement? | ||||
Improving research uptake | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
Improving decision making in health | Yes | No | No | No |
How | ||||
In what ways is research engagement implemented? | ||||
Address patient priorities | Yes | Yes | No* | No |
Conduct research in teams | Yes | Yes | No | No |
What | ||||
Does the definition include an intensity grading? (from limited to active engagement) | Yes | No | No | No |
These comparisons are based on definitions and do not necessarily reflect the full scope of funder goals
*Not identified as part of implementation for specific research projects although role of PPI in research prioritization is part of definition