Table 2:
Results from linear mixed modeling
| Model | Estimate | SE | df | T Value | P Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall spine segmentation | |||||
| BASICseg-1 vs Propseg | −0.12166 | 0.01765 | 484 | −6.893 | <.001 |
| BASICseg-1 vs Deepseg | −0.03382 | 0.01765 | 484 | −1.916 | .056 |
| Spine segmentation at levels of lesion | |||||
| BASICseg-1 vs Propseg | −0.22028 | 0.04410 | 102.62 | −4.995 | <.001 |
| BASICseg-1 vs Deepseg | −0.10254 | 0.04347 | 102.62 | −2.359 | .020 |
| Spine segmentation at normal-appearing level | |||||
| BASICseg-1 vs Propseg | −0.09525 | 0.01687 | 367.5 | −5.645 | <.001 |
| BASICseg-1 vs Deepseg | −0.01338 | 0.01694 | 367.5 | −0.790 | .43 |
| Relative difference in model segmentation between lesion and normal-appearing levels | |||||
| Lesion category difference in Propseg compared with BASICseg-1 | −0.12249 | 0.03928 | 484.4 | −3.119 | <.001 |
| Lesion category difference in Deepseg compared with BASICseg-1 | −0.08689 | 0.03889 | 484.4 | −2.234 | .026 |
Note:—SE indicates standard error.