Skip to main content
. 2019 Jul;40(7):1091–1094. doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A6081

Table 3:

Subgroup analysis of IC for finding categorization

Finding Total (%) (No.) Interval Change (%) (No.) χ2 Likelihood Ratio χ2 Likelihood Ratio P Value IC in the Impression (%) (No.) χ2 Likelihood Ratio χ2 Likelihood Ratio P Value
Total 100% (979) 67.3% (659) 42.6% (417)
Hemorrhage 13.0% (127) 95.3% (121) 67.5 <.001a 67.7% (86) 37.5 <.001a
Infarct/ischemia 7.0% (69) 76.8% (53) 3.2 .07 42.0% (29) 0.01 .9
Intracranial mass 1.4% (14) 92.9% (13) 5.4 .02a 57.1% (8) 1.2 .3
Mass effect 9.7% (95) 82.1% (78) 11.5 .001a 54.7% (52) 6.3 .01a
Microvascular 16.6% (163) 50.9% (83) 22.8 <.001a 33.7% (55) 6.4 .01a
Pneumocephalus 2.9% (28) 71.4% (20) 0.2 .6 46.4% (13) .2 .7
Postprocedural 14.8% (145) 69.7% (101) 0.4 .5 41.4% (60) 0.1 .7
Sinus 5.8% (57) 43.9% (25) 14.1 <.001a 26.3% (15) 6.9 .009a
Soft-tissue/osseous 4.5% (44) 36.4% (16) 18.5 <.001a 11.4% (5) 21.5 <.001a
Ventricular caliber 11.6% (114) 72.8% (83) 1.8 .2 50.9% (58) 3.6 .06
Volume loss 8.7% (85) 47.1% (40) 16.3 <.001a 24.7% (21) 12.9 <.001a
Other 3.9% (38) 68.4% (26) 0.02 .9 39.5% (15) 0.2 .7
a

Statistically significant.