Skip to main content
. 2019 Jul;40(7):1140–1148. doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A6096

Table 1:

Quantitative and qualitative conspicuity assessment

CR Median (IQR) CNR Median (IQR) Visual Score
Besta Intermediate Worst
All CELs (n = 54)
    3D-IR GRE MPRAGE 80.88 (43.71–125.65) 10.02 (5.71–16.06) 15 (27.8%) 26 (48.1%) 13 (24.1%)
    3D-TSE SPACE 100.92b,c (73–191.59) 19.17b,c (13.21–36.01) 54 (100%) 0 0
    3D-GRE VIBE 85.86b,c (43.71–135.22) 16.76b,c (11–37.22) 24 (44.4%)b 25 (46.3%) 5 (9.3%)b
Gliomas (n = 38)
    3D-IR GRE MPRAGE 90.01 (48.29–125.21) 10.51 (5.68–17.33) 9 (23.7%) 19 (50%) 10 (26.3%)
    3D-TSE SPACE 125.64b,c (88.41–187.45) 24.46b,c (12.55–41.23) 38 (100%) 0 0
    3D-GRE VIBE 94.19b,c (58.34–88.95) 16.22d,c (9.89–27.25) 16 (42.1%)d 18 (47.4%) 4 (10.5%)d
Metastases (n = 16)
    3D-IR GRE MPRAGE 54.71 (35.24–130.01) 9.30 (6.77–12.29) 6 (37.5%) 7 (43.8%) 3 (18.8%)
    3D-TSE SPACE 80.04b,c (63.13–200) 17.15b,c (13.63–21.26) 16 (100%) 0 0
    3D-GRE VIBE 72.95b,c (54.19–154.43) 17.26b,c (12.14–31.18) 8 (50%) 7 (43.8%) 1 (6.3%)

Note:—IR indicates inversion recovery; GRE, gradient recalled-echo; CR, contrast rate; CNR, contrast-to-noise ratio; IQR, interquartile range.

a

Because SPACE in the visual assessment was constantly rated as best in all cases, no statistical comparison tests were performed in this analysis.

b

P < .001.

c

P ≤ .01 (adjusted for the order of sequence acquisition; FSL General Linear Model).

d

P = .001 (compared with MPRAGE, Wilcoxon test).