Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2021 May 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Gastrointest Surg. 2019 Aug 29;24(5):1165–1172. doi: 10.1007/s11605-019-04373-z

Table 1.

Comparison of the training and validation datasets for rectal cancer patients.

Rectum
Training Validation p-value
Total Number of Patients 4059 3069 -
Median Age (range) 60 (18 – ≥90) 60 (19 – ≥90) 0.437
Charlson-Deyo Score 0.984
  0 3176 (78.2%) 2404 (78.3%)
  1 681 (16.8%) 511 (16.7%)
  2 130 (3.2%) 102 (3.3%)
  ≥3 72 (1.8%) 52 (1.7%)
Grade Differentiation 0.172
  Well 269 (6.6%) 212 (6.9%)
  Moderate 2949 (72.7%) 2286 (74.5%)
  Poor 776 (19.1%) 525 (17.1%)
  Undifferentiated 65 (1.6%) 47 (1.5%)
Highest CEA Level 46 0.282
  ≤6ng/mL 1096 (27.0%) 834 (27.2%)
  6.1–28.9ng/mL 1177 (29.0%) 839 (27.3%)
  29–97.9ng/mL 768 (18.9%) 573 (18.7%)
  ≥98ng/mL 1018 (25.1%) 823 (26.8%)
Liver Metastasis 3299 (81.3%) 2503 (81.6%) 0.763
Lung Metastasis 1506 (37.1%) 1156 (37.7%) 0.626
Bone Metastasis 344 (8.5%) 229 (7.5%) 0.119
Brain Metastasis 68 (1.7%) 48 (1.6%) 0.713
Peritoneal Metastasis 1050 (25.9%) 844 (27.5%) 0.122
Primary Site Resected 1565 (38.6%) 1158 (37.7%) 0.478
Non-Primary Site Resected 692 (17.0%) 567 (18.5%) 0.118
Median # of Positive LNs (range) 0 (0 – 50) 0 (0 – 37) 0.081
Any Chemotherapy 3372 (83.1%) 2647 (86.2%) <0.001
Any Radiation Therapy 1732 (42.7%) 1248 (40.7%) 0.089