Skip to main content
. 2019 Sep 11;21(2):e68–e78. doi: 10.1093/pm/pnz215

Table 4.

Baseline and follow-up means and effect sizes for pain and functioning outcomes, intervention and control groups

Intervention Group (N = 28)
Control Group (N = 23)
Treatment Effect Size, Partial Eta Squared* P Value for Treatment Effect*
M ± SD
M ± SD
Baseline Follow-up Baseline Follow-up
PROMIS 4-item Pain Interference, t score 58.7 ± 6.1 57.9 ± 6.4 57.0 ± 8.4 57.0 ± 8.0 0.003 0.726
PROMIS 4-item Physical Function difficulty, t score 33.2 ± 4.3 31.9 ± 4.2 32.7 ± 6.2 32.0 ± 4.7 0.006 0.600
PROMIS 4-item Social Participation, t score 38.1 ± 7.3 38.4 ± 7.3 37.0 ± 6.4 38.0 ± 8.0 0.001 0.810
*

Based on repeated-measures analysis of variance.

T scores are normed such that a score of 50 represents the mean or average for the reference population and 1 standard deviation = 10 t-score points. For Pain Interference, a higher score means worse symptomatology (possible range = 42–76). For Physical Function (range = 23–57) and Social Participation (range = 29–64), lower scores represent worse functioning.