Skip to main content
. 2020 Feb 18;2020:7091039. doi: 10.1155/2020/7091039

Table 1.

Corrections as to risk of bias assessment.

Issue Relevant studies Risk Review's assessment [21] Corrected evaluation according to Cochrane Handbook
A Erroneous assessment of risk of bias of “random sequence generation (RSQ) [3641] Random sequence generation High risk Low risk

B Erroneous assessment of risk of bias of “allocation concealment” in six studies [3641] Premature knowledge of allocation High risk Low risk

C Erroneous assessment of risk of bias of “incomplete outcome data” [4246] Incomplete outcome data High risk High risk of bias is not justified

D1 Inconsistent evaluation of risk of bias between studies with the same risk [47] vs. [48] Allocation concealment Low risk, for a study with no advantage of mistletoe [47] vs. high risk, for a study with advantage of mistletoe [48] Equal assessment of risks

D2 Inconsistent evaluation of risk of bias between studies with the same risk [47] vs. [44] Incomplete outcome data Low risk, for a study with no advantage of mistletoe [47] vs. high risk, for a study with advantage of mistletoe [44] Equal assessment of risks

E1 Erroneous assessment of risk of bias of “other sources of bias” [47] Other source of bias Low risk, for a study with no advantage of mistletoe High risk, as essential criticism has been published [49] towards the Kleeberg publication

E2 Erroneous assessment of risk of bias of “other sources of bias” [45, 50, 51] Other source of bias High risk Low risk, a in two of the studies [45, 50] significant results were evaluated

E3 Erroneous assessment of risk of bias of “other sources of bias” at least 16 studies Other source of bias Unclear risk Low risk, as “bad reporting quality” is not a defined criterion for assessing the risk of bias according to the Cochrane Handbook

E4 Erroneous assessment of risk of bias of “other sources of bias” Other source of bias High risk Low risk, as a “multiple testing problem” is not attributable to this study as the only primary endpoint “overall survival” has been proven in a confirmatory test

E5 Erroneous assessment of risk of bias of “other sources of bias” [52] Other source of bias High risk Low risk, as the individual best supportive care was described in this study

Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Review of Interventions [26].