Skip to main content
. 2020 Feb 18;2020:5382739. doi: 10.1155/2020/5382739

Table 4.

Intubation details in scenario D cervical collar stabilization and tongue oedema. Data are presented as median (IQR) or as number (%).

Parameter A B C p values for between-device differences p
Macintosh McGrath TruView PCD A versus B A versus C B versus C
Success rate of intubation attempt (%) 30 (32%) 64 (69%) 58 (62%) <0.001 <0.001 1.0 <0.001

Duration of 1st intubation attempt (s) 54 (39–71) 26 (20–29) 45 (33–56) <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001

Cormack-Lehane grade 0 (0%) 64 (69%) 50 (54%) <0.001 <0.001 0.798 <0.001
1 3 (3%) 29 (31%) 43 (46%)
2 71 (76%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%)
3 19 (21%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%)
4 3 (3–3) 1 (1–2) 1 (1–2)
Median (IQR)

POGO score 35 (29–42) 86 (75–94) 80 (75–91) <0.001 <0.001 0.725 <0.001

Number of optimization manoeuvres (%) 4 (4%) 11 (12%) 1 (1%) <0.001 0.009 0.023 <0.001
0 10 (20%) 47 (51%) 39 (42%)
1 79 (85%) 35 (38%) 533 (57%)
2 2 (2–2) 1 (1–2) 2 (1–2)
Median (IQR)

Severity of dental compression (%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) <0.001 0.489 <0.001 <0.001
0 2 (2%) 76 (82%) 13 (14%)
1 91 (98%) 17 (18%) 80 (86%)
2 2 (2–2) 1 (1–1) 2 (2–2)
Median (IQR)

Ease of use (1–100) 81 (63–90) 34 (28–48) 57 (45–75) <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001