Skip to main content
. 2020 Feb 18;2020:8321732. doi: 10.1155/2020/8321732

Table 4.

Effects of PP, PE, PB, and PW on liver fibrosis indexes (mean ± SD, n = 3).

Group Dose (μg·mL−1) LN (μg·L−1) HA (ng·L−1) PCIII (μg·L−1)
Blank control 0 51.8 ± 0.78 26.9 ± 5.67 18.8 ± 4.53
BJRG 50 211.0 ± 5.08∗∗ 64.5 ± 3.19 29.2 ± 2.53∗∗
Model group (TGF-β1) 0.1 833.4 ± 9.94## 302.3 ± 7.44## 115.3 ± 3.38##
PW 75 638.27 ± 7.22#ΔΔ 178.82 ± 3.94#Δ 108.87 ± 9.29##ΔΔ
PB 75 502.56 ± 5.85#ΔΔ 111.37 ± 4.95#Δ 78.36 ± 5.22
PE 75 118.40 ± 5.74∗∗ 70.80 ± 7.07 28.30 ± 0.21∗∗
PP 75 97.32 ± 6.30∗∗ 30.91 ± 5.22∗∗ 19.01 ± 4.26∗∗

Compared with the blank control group (#P < 0.05, ##P < 0.01); compared with the model group (P < 0.05, ∗∗P < 0.01); compared with the PP group, (ΔP < 0.05, ΔΔP < 0.01).