Skip to main content
. 2020 Feb 28;10(2):e034058. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-034058

Table 2.

Sex-specific and area-specific distribution of diabetic foot ulcer (DFU) risk among the study subjects, n = 1200

IWGDF DFU risk classification Sex Area of residence Overall
Men Women Urban Rural
N (%) N (%) N (%) N (%) N (%)
Group 0 (no PN, no PAD) 242 (54.4) 430 (57) 452 (56) 214 (54.5) 666 (55.5)
Group 1 (PN, no PAD, no deformity) 18 (4) 32 (4.2) 32 (4) 18 (4.6) 50 (4.2)
Group 2A (PN and deformity, no PAD) 49 (11) 90 (11.9) 103 (12.8) 36 (9.2) 139 (11.6)
Group 2B (PAD) 1 (0.2) 2 (0.3) 3 (0.4) 0 3 (0.3)
Group 3A (ulcer history) 97 (21.8) 150 (19.9) 146 (18.1) 101 (25.7) 247 (20.6)
Group 3B (amputation) 38 (8.5) 57 (7.5) 71 (8.8) 24 (6.1) 95 (7.9)

IWGDF, International Working Group on the Diabetic Foot; PAD, peripheral arterial disease; PN, peripheral neuropathy.