Skip to main content
. 2020 Feb 28;5(2):e001918. doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2019-001918

Table 3.

Factors associated with the use of antibiotics for prevention of disease in the past 12 months from the farmer survey

Characteristics Categories Number of farms with data available Use of antibiotic for prevention (%) OR (95% CI) P-value
Farmer’s highest level of education Primary school 37 17 (46.0) rv
Secondary school and higher 47 30 (63.8) 2.28 (0.92–5.65) 0.10
Farmer’s experience ≤10 years 37 16 (43.3) rv
>10 years 47 31 (66.0) 2.82 (1.01–8.08) 0.04*
Farmer’s knowledge a Score<60% 29 14 (48.3) rv
Score≥60% 52 32 (61.5) 1.86 (0.72–4.75) 0.19
Size of farm Smallholder farm 26 11 (42.3) rv
Commercial farm 58 36 (62.1) 2.54 (0.96–6.71) 0.05
Type of farm Farrowing to finisher farm 54 37 (68.5) rv
Fattening 30 10 (33.3) 0.33 (0.12–0.87) 0.02*
GAP certified farm No 53 26 (49.1) rv
Yes 31 21 (67.7) 2.54 (0.96–6.71) 0.05
Member of cooperative farm No 67 33 (49.3) rv
Yes 17 14 (82.4) 7.73 (1.49–40.01) 0.01*
Contracted farm No 76 42 (55.3) rv
Yes 8 5 (62.5) 1.28 (0.28–5.80) 0.75
Household income per month Less than BHT 50,000 47 21 (44.7) rv
More than BHT 50,000 23 18 (78.3) 4.46 (1.32–15.05) 0.01*
Advice on animal health Not receiving advice 16 5 (31.3) rv
Receiving advice 68 42 (61.8) 3.78 (1.12–12.73) 0.02*

*Statistically significant at p<0.05.

†Knowledge: five true/false statements in relation to the use of antibiotics and AMR, taken from the AMR module in the 2017 National Health Welfare survey form.

AMR, antimicrobial resistance; GAP, Good Agriculture Practice; rv, reference value.