Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2021 Mar 1.
Published in final edited form as: Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2019 Oct 18;101(3):418–425. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2019.09.010

Table 2.

Single and dual-task gait performance according to pain distribution, 302 older adults, MOBILIZE Boston Study II.

Number of Pain Sites No Pain Single Site Pain Multisite Pain
(n=96) (n=75) (n=131)

Variables Mean SD Mean SD Mean SD
Gait Speed (m/sec) Single-Task 1.00 0.23 0.87 0.27 0.84 0.24
Easy Dual-Task 0.85 0.23 0.72 0.25 0.71 0.24
Hard Dual-Task 0.78* 0.24 0.68* 0.25 0.67* 0.24
Stride Length (cm) Single-Task 113.33 21.34 104.05 23.50 100.18 20.47
Easy Dual-Task 105.53 22.40 95.45 24.41 93.41 21.30
Hard Dual-Task 102.18* 23.34 92.89* 24.39 90.86* 21.27
Swing Time (%) Single-Task 0.34 0.02 0.32 0.01 0.32 0.03
Easy Dual-Task 0.33 0.03 0.31 0.05 0.31 0.04
Hard Dual-Task 0.32* 0.04 0.30* 0.06 0.30* 0.04
Double Support Time (%) Single-Task 0.33 0.05 0.37 0.10 0.37 0.07
Easy Dual-Task 0.35 0.06 0.40 0.11 0.39 0.08
Hard Dual-Task 0.36* 0.07 0.42* 0.16 0.40* 0.09
Stride Length Variability (CV)a Single-Task 4.15 2.02 4.78 2.64 4.94 2.57
Easy Dual-Task 4.98 2.46 6.38 3.51 5.94 3.16
Hard Dual-Task 5.75* 3.24 7.09* 4.22 6.64* 3.58
Swing Time Variability (CV)a Single-Task 5.25 2.04 6.72 2.87 6.79 2.70
Easy Dual-Task 7.90 4.83 9.86 4.90 9.20 4.35
Hard Dual-Task 9.07* 6.09 11.35* 6.76 10.65* 5.78
*

Test for column trend, according to dual-task difficulty within pain groups (ANOVA) p<0.05

test for row trend, for linear relationship across pain categories within gait test dual-task conditions (General Linear Model) p<0.05.

a

CV= coefficient of variation