Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2021 Mar 1.
Published in final edited form as: Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2019 Oct 18;101(3):418–425. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2019.09.010

Table 4.

Dual-task cost (DTC %) according to pain distribution, 302 older adults, MOBILIZE Boston Study II.

Number of Pain Sites No Pain Single Site Pain Multisite Pain*
(n=96) (n=75) (n=131)

Variables Mean SD Mean SD Mean SD
Gait Speed (m/sec) DTC Easy 15.3 10.3 18.3 10.6 15.4 11.7
DTC Hard 21.7 13.9 23.0 13.1 20.9 13.5
Stride Length (cm) DTC Easy 7.1 6.2 8.8 6.2 7.0 6.6
DTC Hard 10.2 8.6 11.5 7.5 9.6 7.0
Swing Time (%) DTC Easy 3.1 4.3 5.2 6.0 4.0 5.2
DTC Hard 5.2 6.4 7.8 9.1 6.2 7.2
Double Support Time (%) DTC Easy 6.8 8.2 8.7 7.0 6.9 7.6
DTC Hard 11.1 13.8 13.1 13.8 10.2 10.3
Stride Length Variability (CV)a DTC Easy 29.3 50.5 39.6 49.7 29.7 56.0
DTC Hard 54.0 96.9 56.0 71.4 44.4 61.6
Swing Time Variability (CV)a DTC Easy 56.9 109.5 51.9 50.7 43.3 79.3
DTC Hard 83.5 143.4 71.6 79.4 65.9 101.0

DTC%=100×SingleTaskScoreDualTaskScoreSingleTaskScore for gait speed, stride length, and swing time (%).

DTC%=100×DualTaskScoreSingleTaskScoreSingleTaskScore for double support time (%), stride length variability and swing time variability.

a

CV= coefficient of variation

*

In general linear regression testing for linear trend across pain groups, there was no significant trend in any of the dual-task cost outcomes according to pain distribution.