Skip to main content
. 2015 Feb 2;2015(2):CD001067. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001067.pub3

Comparison 5. Agent with longer half‐life versus similar agent with shorter half‐life.

Outcome or subgroup title No. of studies No. of participants Statistical method Effect size
1 Treatment failure 2 484 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 0.61 [0.40, 0.92]
2 Severe complication 1 355 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 0.27 [0.02, 2.89]
3 Wound infection 2 484 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 0.70 [0.13, 3.68]
4 Allergic reaction 1 377 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 0.78 [0.22, 2.72]
5 Diarrhea 1 129 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 1.43 [0.42, 4.84]
6 Length of stay 1 129 Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI) ‐0.60 [‐1.45, 0.25]