Skip to main content
. 2015 Feb 2;2015(2):CD001067. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001067.pub3

Pietrantoni 1998.

Methods Randomized trial
 Study period: not stated
Participants Inclusion criteria: women clinically diagnosed as having postpartum endomyometritis; the presence of fever (102.2 °F/39 °C), pelvic pain, and foul lochia
 Setting: Lousiville, USA
 Number of participants: n = 19
Interventions Oral therapy using ofloxacin 400 mg every 12 hours plus clindamycin 900 mg every 8 hours until 24 hours afebrile vs clindamycin 900 mg iv every 8 hours plus gentamicin iv 5mg/kg/day every 8 hours until afebrile
"Antibiotic therapy was continued for at least 48 hours unless significant clinical deterioration occurred necessitating the withdrawal of the patient from the study."
Outcomes Treatment failure
Notes This study was a preliminary study that enrolled 19 women towards the overall enrolment of 60 women for statistical significance
There is no publication or report found after this publication
 Pharmaceutical sponsorship ‐ none apparent
 Information on number of cesarean births and vaginal births were not given
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Unclear risk States "randomised" in the title and objective without further description
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Unclear risk Not stated
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) 
 All outcomes Low risk The interventions were evident, although the outcomes would not have been affected by a lack of blinding
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) 
 All outcomes Unclear risk Not stated
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) 
 All outcomes High risk There was no reason stated for 3 (16%) women loss to follow‐up; since n = 19, the loss of 3 women could certainly affect the outcome
Selective reporting (reporting bias) Unclear risk No protocol available. Only 1 outcome exists in the results
Other bias Unclear risk This study was a preliminary study that enrolled 19 women towards the overall enrolment of 60 women for statistical significance. However, we could not find any relevant reports or publications that followed this publication. There is a possibility that the trial stopped early due to some data‐dependent process