. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 Mar 2.

Published in final edited form as: Int J Sch Educ Psychol. 2018 Aug 15;7(Suppl 1):182–200. doi: 10.1080/21683603.2018.1458357

Table 7.

Significant correlations of CELF 4 parent ratings for speaking items with fMRI connectivity of significant magnitude from seeds for written words with brain regions associated with motor regions.

Trouble using complete sentences when talking

fMRI connectivity from Left Precuneus with Left Primary Motor Area, BA4a, r = .32, p = .04

fMRI connectivity from Left Occipital Temporal with Left Primary Motor Area, BA4a, r = .31, p = .05

fMRI connectivity from Left Occipital Temporal with Left Primary Motor Area, BA4p, r = .42, p < .01

fMRI connectivity from Left Supramarginal with Left Primary Motor Area, BA4a, r = .37, p < .05

fMRI connectivity from Left Supramarginal with Right Primary Motor Area, BA4a, r = .34, p < .05

fMRI connectivity from Left Supramarginal with Left Primary Motor Area BA4p, r = .41, p < .01

fMRI connectivity from Left Supramarginal with Right Primary Motor Area BA4p, r = .32, p < .05

Trouble staying on subject when talking

fMRI connectivity from Left Supramarginal with Right Primary Motor Area, BA4p, r = −.30, p = .05

Talks in short, choppy sentences

fMRI connectivity from Left Supramarginal with Left Primary Motor Area, BA4p, r = .31, p < .05

Note. No significant DTI findings for cerebellum on any CELF 4 speaking item.