Table 3.
1. Methodological limitations | ‘The extent to which there are concerns about the design or conduct of the primary studies that contributed evidence to an individual review finding’ (Lewin et al., 2018a, p. 1) |
2. Coherence | ‘An assessment of how clear and cogent the fit is between the data from the primary studies and a review finding that synthesizes that data’ (Lewin et al., 2018a, p. 1) |
3. Adequacy | ‘An overall determination of the degree of richness and quantity of data supporting a review finding’ (Lewin et al., 2018a, p. 1) |
4. Relevance | ‘The extent to which the body of data from the primary studies supporting a review finding is applicable to the context specified in the review question’ (Lewin et al., 2018a, p. 1) |