Table 2.
Estimated regression coefficients of binary logistic regression model (BlogM) for child malnutrition status defined as height-for-age Z-score less than −2.00, the corresponding odds ratios (ORs), and adjusted predicted proportion (APP) of malnourished children from nominal-scale multiple classification analysis (NS-MCA) model, BDHS 2011
| Background Characteristics | Estimated regression coefficient of BlogM and OR | Predicted proportion from NS-MCA | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Β | OR | APP | |
| Child’s age in months (Reference Category: <12) | |||
| <12 | 20.83 | ||
| 12–23 | 1.406 | 4.081*** | 48.89 |
| 24–35 | 1.314 | 3.722*** | 46.78 |
| 36–47 | 1.284 | 3.610*** | 46.13 |
| 48–59 | 1.027 | 2.792*** | 40.42 |
| Child’s birth weight (Reference Category: Large) | |||
| Large | 33.61 | ||
| Average | 0.318 | 1.374** | 39.95 |
| Small | 0.753 | 2.123*** | 49.47 |
| Birth interval in months (Reference Category: 48+) | |||
| <24 | 0.383 | 1.467*** | 47.35 |
| 24–47 | 0.208 | 1.231** | 43.47 |
| 48+ | 38.90 | ||
| Mother’s education (Reference Category: Higher) | |||
| Illiterate | 0.642 | 1.900*** | 44.23 |
| Primary | 0.592 | 1.807*** | 42.92 |
| Secondary | 0.418 | 1.519*** | 39.08 |
| Higher | 32.10 | ||
| Mother’s BMI(kg/m2) (Reference Category: 18.5–24.99) | |||
| <18.5 | 0.270 | 1.310*** | 45.91 |
| 18.5–24.99 | 39.81 | ||
| 25+ | −0.346 | 0.708*** | 33.19 |
| Household economic status (Reference Category: Richest) | |||
| Poorest | 1.109 | 3.031*** | 51.26 |
| Poorer | 0.869 | 2.385*** | 45.68 |
| Middle | 0.673 | 1.961*** | 41.20 |
| Richer | 0.451 | 1.570*** | 36.48 |
| Richest | 27.71 | ||
| Family size (number of members) (Reference Category: Middle) | |||
| Small (<4) | 0.173 | 1.189* | 42.58 |
| Middle (4–6) | 39.00 | ||
| Large (7+) | 0.177 | 1.194** | 42.80 |
| Place of residence (Reference Category: Urban) | |||
| Urban | 42.84 | ||
| Rural | −0.153 | 0.858* | 39.71 |
| Region (Division) (Reference Category: Barisal) | |||
| Barisal | 41.29 | ||
| Chittagong | 0.011 | 1.011 | 41.54 |
| Dhaka | 0.108 | 1.114 | 43.65 |
| Khulna | −0.198 | 0.820 | 37.34 |
| Rajshahi | −0.400 | 0.671*** | 33.12 |
| Rangpur | −0.057 | 0.944 | 40.12 |
| Sylhet | 0.158 | 1.171 | 44.60 |
| Goodness-of-fit | H-L test: =10.090; p-value: 0.259 | F 26,7620 = 41.329; p-value < 0.001 | |
| Omnibus test: =1025.05; p-value < 0.001 | |||
| R2 value | 0.125 | 0.124 | |
*** P < 0.001; ** P < 0.01; * <0.05