Table 3.
Relationships between genotype and nutritional status, based on a multiple logistic regression
| Variables | Dietary adequacya | Stunting | Underweight | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| aOR | 95% CI | aOR | 95% CI | aOR | 95% CI | |
| Age (years) | ||||||
| < 5 | 1 | 1 | 1 | |||
| 5–8 | 0.41 | 0.09, 1.76 | 1.38 | 0.38, 5.06 | 3.29 | 0.71, 15.29 |
| 9–12 | 1.00 | 0.24, 4.23 | 1.87 | 0.52, 6.74 | 2.69 | 0.65, 11.20 |
| Sex | ||||||
| Male | 1 | 1 | 1 | |||
| Female | 0.52 | 0.22, 1.26 | 1.27 | 0.53, 3.03 | 0.68 | 0.25, 1.82 |
| Genotype | ||||||
| Othersb | 1 | 1 | 1 | |||
| SS | 0.45* | 0.18, 1.10 | 3.48** | 1.10, 11.01 | 1.54 | 0.51, 4.66 |
aMeeting the RDA of at least five nutrients assessed, including energy
bThis includes genotypes SC and SF
*p < 0.10, **p < 0.05