Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 Mar 2.
Published in final edited form as: Pers Individ Dif. 2016 May 21;99:313–319. doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2016.05.035

Table 3.

Indirect effects

Predictor Mediator(s) Outcome Indirect effect 95% CI
Negative Urgency BOR Alcohol Use 0.012, p = .686 −.036 – .059
Negative Urgency BOR Alcohol Problems 0.121, p < .001 .076 – .166
(lack of) Perseverance BOR Alcohol Use 0.002, p = .714 −.007 – .011
(lack of) Perseverance BOR Alcohol Problems 0.020, p = .012 .005 – .020
Negative Urgency ANT Alcohol Use 0.047, p = .001 .024 – .070
Negative Urgency ANT Alcohol Problems 0.080, p < .001 .052 – .108
Positive Urgency ANT Alcohol Use 0.045, p = .001 .023 – .066
Positive Urgency ANT Alcohol Problems 0.075, p < .001 .047 – .104
(lack of) Premeditation ANT Alcohol Use 0.045, p = .001 .025 – .066
(lack of) Premeditation ANT Alcohol Problems 0.076, p < .001 .053 – .076
Sensation Seeking ANT Alcohol Use 0.056, p < .001 .032 – .080
Sensation Seeking ANT Alcohol Problems 0.094, p < .001 .068 – .121
ANT Alcohol Use Alcohol Problems 0.097, p < .001 .058 – .135

Note. BOR = PAI Borderline Scale; ANT = PAI Antisocial Scale; Indirect effects are standardized path coefficients; 95% CI = 95% confident interval calculated using bootstrapped confidence intervals.