Table 3:

Changes in lesion volumes

Reference	Year	Patients with Lesion Progression	Patients with No Change	Patients with Lesion Reversal
Delgado-Mederos et al30*	2007	80%	13%	7%
Rivers et al29†	2006	44%	n/a	56%
Seitz et al28†	2005	52%	n/a	48%
Ritzl et al27	2004	8%	8%	83%
Schramm et al26	2004	69%	0%	31%
Schaefer et al25	2004	88%	6%	6%
Fiehler et al24‡	2004	79%	n/a	21%
Shih et al23	2003	36%	0%	64%
Schramm et al22	2002	85%	5%	10%
Parsons et al21	2002	61%	25%	14%
Schellinger et al20§	2001	100%	n/a	0%
Kidwell et al18	2000	29%	0%	71%
Parsons et al19	2000	42%	26%	32%
Beaulieu et al15	1999	47%	20%	33%
Neumann-Haefelin et al17	1999	50%	10%	40%
Sorensen et al16	1999	70%	17%	13%
Barber et al31	1998	44%	13%	44%
Tong et al14‖	1998	75%	13%	13%

Note:—n/a indicates not applicable.

^*Percentages based on author's report of stratified lesion volumes.

^†Percentages based on author's dichotomization of DWI volume as more or less than follow-up T2 volume.

^‡Initial volumes determined by apparent diffusion coefficient decrease of >20%, not DWI hyperintensity.

^§Based on author commentary, not individual data points.

^‖Values inferred from data presented in graphic form.