Skip to main content
. 2009 Sep;30(8):1534–1540. doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A1620

Table 1:

Characteristics of the 4 study groups or the number and percentage of patients with the condition*

Characteristics Ghent Independent of DE (n = 73) Ghent Dependent on DE (n = 14) Not Fulfilling Ghent (n = 18) Control (n = 101) P Value
Age (mean ± SD) 39.4 (12.2) 40.6 (17.1) 36.1 (13.4) 39.6 (12.9) .74
Females (No.) (%) 45 (61.6) 11 (78.6) 11 (61.6) 64 (63.4) .68
DSR L3 (mean ± SD) 0.50b,c (0.11), n = 69 0.53c (0.06) 0.43a (0.08), n = 14 0.45a,b (0.07) <.001
DSR L4 (mean ± SD 0.50b (0.12), n = 72 0.51b (0.07) 0.41a (0.06) 0.43a (0.07) <.001
DSR L5 (mean ± SD) 0.57b (0.18), n = 68 0.65b (0.20) 0.39a (0.09) 0.42a (0.08) <.001
DSR S1 (mean ± SD) 0.94b (0.69), n = 61 1.02b (0.77), n = 13 0.40a (0.12), n = 12 0.41a (0.13), n = 96 <.001
DSD sacrum > DSD L4 38 (55.1%), n = 69 4 (28.6%) 1 (5.6%) 5 (5.0%) <.001
Herniation of nerve root sleeves
    Present in ≥1 level (No.) (%) 53 (72.6%) 10 (71.4%) 2 (11.1%) 1 (1%) <.001
    Present in level L5 9 (12.3%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) <.001
    Present in level S1 35 (47.9%) 8 (57.1%) 2 (11.1%) 0 (0%) <.001
    Present in level S2 48 (65.8%) 8 (57.1%) 1 (5.6%) 1 (1%) <.001
    Present in level S3 30 (41.1%) 5 (35.7%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) <.001
    Present in level S4 8 (11%) 1 (7.1%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) <.004
Odds ratio, ≥1 herniation of the nerve root sleeve 265 (34–2029) 250 (25–2458) 12.5 (1–145) ref <.001
Anterior meningocele 27 (37%) 2 (14%) 0 0 <.001
Scalloping L1-S1 ≥1 level 44 (61.1 %), n = 72 8 (42.9%) 1 (5.6%) 4 (4%), n = 100 <.001
Perineural cysts 11 (15.1 %) 1 (7.1%) 1 (5.6%) 8 (7.9%) .387
Disk herniation beneath T12 5 (7%), n = 69 1 (7%) 2 (11%) 6 (6%) .890
Caudal end of dural sac
    L5, L5/S1, S1 10 (14.5%) 0 (0%) 9 (50%) 22 (21.8%) <.001
    S2 26 (37.7%) 9 (64.3%) 8 (44.4%) 68 (67.3%) <.001
    S3, S4, S5 33 (47.8%), n = 69 5 (35.7%) 1 (5.6%) 11 (10.9%) <.001

Note:—DE, dural ectasia; DSR, dural sac ratio; DSD, dural sac diameter.

*

Study groups not containing similar letters (a, b, c, or d) for means were statistically different at the 5% level. Where n is specified in a cell, there were some observations missing and n is the actual number of observations. Missing values are due to incomplete anatomic coverage with CT, extreme scoliosis at MR, or the dural sac ending above the missed level.