Skip to main content
. 2009 Apr;30(4):736–743. doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A1424

Fig 2.

Fig 2.

Comparison of the resolution of the 1 × 1 × 1 mm isotropic volume scan (A) with the 0.8-mm thin-section volume scan (B) in a patient with relatively normal mammillary body volumes. The 2 sections are taken from neighboring sections around the central region of the patient's mammillary bodies and show the higher resolution of the 0.8-mm scan and the resultant benefit for the identification of the mammillary body landmarks.