Skip to main content
. 2020 Feb 25;11:118. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2020.00118

TABLE 6.

Summary of previously reported early SCD detection using ECG/HRV signals.

Author (year) Data (ECG or HRV) Total no. of features Method (features) Classification Results
Early SCD detection using 1-min interval ECG/HRV signals
Ebrahimzadeh and Pooyan (2011) 35 normal and 35 SCD (HRV) Source: Normal Sinus Rhythm (NSR) database and Sudden Cardiac Death Holter (SCD) database 20 Linear and non-linear methods (time-domain features (5); frequency-domain features (4); time-frequency domain features (11)) KNN, Multilayer perceptron (MLP) Acc = 91.23% (2nd 1 min before)
Ebrahimzadeh et al. (2014) 35 normal and 35 SCD (HRV) Source: NSR database and SCD database 24 Linear and non-linear methods (time-domain features (5); frequency-domain features (4); time-frequency domain features (11); non-linear features (4)) KNN, Multilayer Perceptron Neural Network Sen = 83.75% Acc = 83.93% (4th 1 min before)
Acharya et al., 2015a 36 normal and 40 SCD (ECG) Source: NSR database and SCD database 18 DWT, non-linear methods (non-linear features (6)) SVM, DT, KNN Sen = 92.50% Spe = 91.67% Acc = 92.11% (4th 1 min before)
Acharya et al., 2015b 36 normal and 40 SCD (HRV) Source: NSR database and SCD database 10 Recurrence Quantification Analysis, non-linear methods (RQA parameters (10)) SVM, PNN, KNN, DT Sen = 85% Spe = 88.8% Acc = 86.8% (4th 1 min before)
Mirhoseini et al. (2016) 18 normal and 19 SCD (HRV) Source: NSR database and SCD database 22 Linear and non-linear methods (time-domain features (5); frequency-domain features (4); time-frequency domain features (10); non-linear features (3)) SVM Spe = 89.5% Acc = 83.24% (1st 1 min before)
Fujita et al. (2016) 18 normal and 20 SCD (HRV) Source: NSR database and SCD database 9 Wavelet transform, non-linear methods (non-linear features (9)) DT, SVM, KNN Sen = 95% Spe = 94.4% Acc = 94.7% (4th 1 min before)
Ebrahimzadeh et al. (2017) 35 normal and 35 SCD (HRV) Source: NSR database and SCD database 24 Linear and non-linear methods (time-domain features (5); frequency-domain features (4); time-frequency domain features (11); non-linear features (4)) MLP Sen = 82.67% Spe = 85.09% Acc = 83.88% (12th 1 min before)
Ebrahimzadeh et al. (2018a) 35 normal and 35 SCD (HRV) Source: NSR database and SCD database 24 Linear and non-linear methods (time-domain features (5); frequency-domain features (4); time -frequency domain features (11); non-linear features (4)) MLP, KNN Acc = 83.96% (4th 1 min before)
Ebrahimzadeh et al. (2019) 35 normal and 35 SCD (HRV) Source: NSR database and SCD database 28 Linear and non-linear methods (time-domain features (5); frequency-domain features (4); time-frequency domain features (11); non-linear features (8)) MLP, SVM, KNN Sen = 85.72% Spe = 82.86% Acc = 84.28% (13th 1 min before)
Early SCD detection using HRV signals of 2-min interval
Shen et al. (2007) 20 normal and 23 SCD Source: NSR database and SCD database 4 Non-linear methods (time-frequency domain features (4)) Artificial neural networks (ANN); back propagation (BP) Acc = 87.5% (1st 2 min before)
Murukesan et al. (2014) 18 normal and 20 SCD Source: NSR database and SCD database 34 Linear and non-linear methods, Poincaré plot analysis (time-domain features(15); frequency-domain features(13); non-linear features (6)) SVM, PNN Sen = 93.33% Spe = 100% Acc = 96.36% (1st 2 min before)
Current Study 36 normal and 40 SCD Source: NSR database and SCD database 27 EEMD, linear and non-linear methods (time-domain features(3); frequency-domain features (4); non-linear features (5)) KNN Sen = 95%; Spe = 97.2% Acc = 96.1% (1st 2 min before) Average acc = 94.7% (14 min before)

Sen, sensitivity; Spe, specificity; Acc, accuracy.