Table 1.
A Comparison of the Activity and Durability over Monometallic Pt-Based Catalysts for Ammonia Borane Hydrolysis
| Catalyst | dPt (nm) | Pt B.E. (eV) | R (molH2·molM−1·min−1) | Ea (kJ·mol−1) | Durability | Ref. |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Commercial Pt/C | 2.5 | – | 83.3a,b | – | – | Chandra and Xu, 2007 |
| Pt/C | 1.9 | – | 111a,b | – | – | Chandra and Xu, 2007 |
| Pt(8%)/CCF-500 | 3.4 | 71.80 | 35c | 39.2 | 47% (r5th/r1st)a | Yuan et al., 2017 |
| (Zn’6)Pt/RGO | 1.2 | ∼71.5 | 284b | – | 49% (r5th/r1st)a | Chen et al., 2017c |
| SiO2@Pt@NGO | 1.9 | 71.12 | 324.6c | – | 39% (r6th/r1st) | Ye et al., 2017 |
| Pt20/CNT | 1.9 | 71.5 | 416.5b | 48.3 | 40% (r4th/r1st) | Zhang et al., 2017 |
| Pt/CNT-G | 2.8 | – | 135b | 35.3 | – | Uzundurukan and Devrim, 2019 |
| Pt/CNT-P | 1.4 | 71.9 | 141.7c | – | 24% (r5th/r1st) | Chen et al., 2015 |
| Pt/CNT-O | 1.6 | 71.7 | 54.4c | – | ~43% (r5th/r1st) | Chen et al., 2015 |
| Pt/CNT-D | 1.3 | 72.0 | 416.0c | – | ~62% (r5th/r1st) | Chen et al., 2015 |
| Pt/CNT-5W | ~1.4 | 71.85 | 710c | 27.8 | 45% (r5th/r1st) | This work |
| Pt/CNT-10W | ~1.4 | 71.80 | 558c | 28.7 | 68% (r5th/r1st) | This work |
| Pt-CeO2/rGO | 2.8 | 71.26 | 93.8b | 64.7 | 92% (r10th/r1st) | Yao et al., 2016 |
| Pt/SiO2 | 5.1 | – | 55a | – | – | Chandra and Xu, 2007 |
| Pt@MIL-101 | 1.8 | – | 414b | – | – | Aijaz et al., 2012 |
| Fe3O4@SiO2@Pt@mSiO2 | – | – | 5.5d | 35.4 | 62% (r5th/r1st)a | Xu et al., 2017 |
| Pt-CeO2 | 5.0 | – | 133b | – | 66% (r5th/r1st) | Wang et al., 2012 |
| SEA-Pt/HNTs | 1.5 | – | 321b | 49.2 | 71% (r10th/r1st) | Yin et al., 2019 |
| Pt25@TiO2 | 2.4 | 71.02 | 311b | – | 75% (r3rd/r1st) | Khalily et al., 2016 |
a
Estimated from the slope of the fitting line.
b
Measured under 25°C.
c
Measured under 30°C.
d
Measured under 35°C.