Skip to main content
. 2020 Feb 20;11:214. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00214

TABLE 2.

Mixed effect logistic regression model on correct syllable-tone, Gates 2-3, 4-5, 6-7.

Gates 2-3 Estimate Std. Z P
error
(Intercept) −1.42 0.28 −4.99 <0.001
L1 Multi-talker −1.48 0.29 −5.03 <0.001
L2 Multi-talker Test 1 −1.65 0.29 −5.70 <0.001
L2 Multi-talker Test 2 −1.12 0.29 −3.82 <0.001
L2 Single-talker Test 1 −2.06 0.32 −6.38 <0.001
L2 Single-talker Test 2 −1.18 0.31 −3.76 <0.001
Frequency 0.78 0.18 4.23 <0.001
Pairwise comparisons
L1 Multi-talker – L2 Multi-talker Test 1 0.18 0.27 0.66 0.986
L1 Multi-talker – L2 Multi-talker Test 2 −0.36 0.27 −1.31 0.781
L1 Multi-talker – L2 Single-talker Test 1 0.59 0.30 1.91 0.395
L1 Multi-talker – L2 Single-talker Test 2 −0.29 0.29 −0.99 0.922
L2 Multi-talker Test 1 – L2 Multi-talker Test 2 −0.53 0.11 −2.53 0.100
L2 Multi-talker Test 1 – L2 Single-talker Test 1 0.40 0.30 1.33 0.763
L2 Multi-talker Test 2 – L2 Single-talker Test 2 0.06 0.29 0.21 0.999
L2 Single-talker Test 1 – L2 Single-talker Test 2 −0.88 0.32 −2.68 0.078
Gates 4–5
(Intercept) 0.15 0.27 0.54 585
L1 Multi-talker −1.28 0.29 −4.36 <0.001
L2 Multi-talker Test 1 −1.91 0.29 −6.53 <0.001
L2 Multi-talker Test 2 −1.61 0.29 −5.49 <0.001
L2 Single-talker Test 1 −2.11 0.32 −6.59 <0.001
L2 Single-talker Test 2 −1.41 0.32 −4.46 <0.001
Frequency 0.55 0.16 3.34 <0.001
Pairwise comparisons
L1 Multi-talker – L2 Multi-talker Test 1 0.63 0.267 2.36 0.170
L1 Multi-talker – L2 Multi-talker Test 2 0.34 0.26 1.25 0.810
L1 Multi-talker – L2 Single-talker Test 1 0.83 0.30 2.79 0.058
L1 Multi-talker – L2 Single-talker Test 2 0.14 0.29 0.46 0.997
L2 Multi-talker Test 1 – L2 Multi-talker Test 2 −0.29 0.09 −2.24 0.190
L2 Multi-talker Test 1 – L2 Single-talker Test 1 0.20 0.29 0.68 0.983
L2 Multi-talker Test 2 – L2 Single-talker Test 2 −0.20 0.29 −0.67 0.984
L2 Single-talker Test 1 – L2 Single-talker Test 2 −0.69 0.32 −2.16 0.255
Gates 6–7
(Intercept) 1.02 0.26 3.97 <0.001
L1 Multi-talker −0.84 0.27 −3.05 0.002
L2 Multi-talker Test 1 −2.05 0.27 −7.50 <0.001‘
L2 Multi-talker Test 2 −1.89 0.28 −6.86 <0.001
L2 Single-talker Test 1 −2.32 0.30 −7.76 <0.001
L2 Single-talker Test 2 −1.56 0.30 −5.23 <0.001
Frequency 0.37 0.15 2.45 0.014
Pairwise comparisons
L1 Multi-talker – L2 Multi-talker Test 1 1.21 0.25 4.90 <0.001
L1 Multi-talker – L2 Multi-talker Test 2 1.05 0.25 4.22 <0.001
L1 Multi-talker – L2 Single-talker Test 1 1.49 0.27 5.38 <0.001
L1 Multi-talker – L2 Single-talker Test 2 0.72 0.27 3.62 0.012
L2 Multi-talker Test 1 – L2 Multi-talker Test 2 −0.16 0.084 −1.88 0.416
L2 Multi-talker Test 1 – L2 Single-talker Test 1 0.27 0.27 0.99 0.922
L2 Multi-talker Test 2 – L2 Single-talker Test 2 −0.34 0.27 −1.23 0.819
L2 Single-talker Test 1 – L2 Single-talker Test 2 −0.77 0.30 −2.58 0.103

Glmer[corect ∼ group + frequency + (frequency| subject) + (talker| token), family = “binomial”]. Reference level = L1 Single-talker.