Skip to main content
. 2020 Jan 9;128(2):397–409. doi: 10.1152/japplphysiol.00620.2019

Table 3.

Mean (SD) estimated gain coefficient {Cm} of PDM contributions to model-predicted output due to ETCO2 input for CS vs. HP

Gain of PDM 1 for ETCO2 Input
Gain of PDM 2 for ETCO2 Input
Gain of PDM 3 for ETCO2 Input
Gain of PDM 4 for ETCO2 Input
20 CS 24 HP 20 CS 24 HP 20 CS 24 HP 20 CS 24 HP
Mean (SD) 0.0630 (0.2735) −0.2336 (0.388) −0.0497 (0.2041) −0.1242 (0.2346) 0.0643 (0.1257) 0.1131 (0.2829) 0.0314 (0.1265) 0.0169 (0.1853)
P 0.0050 0.2660 0.4532 0.7609

CS, control subjects; ETCO2, end-tidal CO2; HP, hypertensive patients; PDM, principal dynamic mode. Significant P value is in boldface.