Table 2.
A. Antecedent patient mood in the different types of harm/damage | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Previous mooda | Self‐inflicted harm | Harm/damage to other people/objects | Harm to communication taking place | Harm to an activity taking place |
Calm | 49% | 84% | 76% | 52% |
Agitated | 51% | 16% | 24% | 48% |
B. Situational antecedents in the different types of harm/damage | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Antecedentsb | Self‐inflicted harm | Harm/damage to other people/objects | Harm to communication taking place | Harm to an activity taking place |
Behavioral evocation | 29% | 9% | 20% | 30% |
Change of position | 7% | 0% | 2% | 19% |
Pressure to perform | 29% | 13% | 85% | 61% |
Opportunity | 56% | 97% | 0% | 11% |
Emptiness/boredom | 7% | 3% | 2% | 4% |
Urgency/confusion | 24% | 3% | 22% | 11% |
Other | 17% | 0% | 7% | 11% |
Note: Percentages are calculated on the observations' total number for each harm/damage category.
Despite LND children are considered to display poor mood control, the antecedent mood before an LNB is more frequently calm than agitated.
The simple opportunity is the most frequent situational antecedent in case of self‐injurious behavior and harm to other/object. The pressure to perform is always badly tolerated and frequently predisposing to harm to communication and to an activity in progress.