Skip to main content
. 2020 Feb 3;11(7):1976–1984. doi: 10.7150/jca.38567

Table 3.

Univariate and Multivariate COX regression analysis for Disease-free Survival and Overall Survival in in young age breast cancer patient group.

Variables Disease-free Survival Overall Survival
Univariate analysis Multivariate analysis Univariate analysis Multivariate analysis
HR(95%CI) p value HR(95%CI) p value HR(95%CI) p value HR(95%CI) p value
TNM Staging
I 1 (Reference) 1 (Reference) 1 (Reference) 1 (Reference)
II 1.837(0.950-3.552) 0.071 1.525(0.783-2.972) 0.215 2.057(1.038-4.075) 0.039 1.756(0.881-3.503) 0.110
III 5.631(2.965-10.695) <0.001 3.999(2.071-7.721) <0.001 6.263(3.211-12.216) <0.001 4.241(2.137-8.418) <0.001
IV 27.496(13.363-56.575) <0.001 15.965(7.477-34.088) <0.001 22.081(10.088-48.333) <0.001 11.317(4.969-25.777) <0.001
Histological grade
G1 1 (Reference) 1 (Reference) 1 (Reference) 1 (Reference)
G2 2.683 (0.368-19.558) 0.330 1.978 (0.268-14.582) 0.503 2.552(0.349-18.651) 0.356 1.853 (0.251-13.704) 0.546
G3 8.184 (1.142-58.657) 0.036 3.788 (0.518-27.694) 0.189 8.031(1.120-57.578) 0.038 3.955 (0.541-28.938) 0.176
ER status
(Negative vs Positive)
0.622(0.441-0.876) 0.007 0.809 (0.566-1.155) 0.244 0.605(0.426-0.861) 0.005 0.784(0.484-1.156) 0.191
PR status
(Negative vs Positive)
0.732(0.518-1.036) 0.078 - - 0.697 (0.489-0.992) 0.045 1.063(0.688-1.642) 0.782
HER-2 status
- or + 1 (Reference) 1 (Reference) 1 (Reference) 1 (Reference)
++ 1.018(0.543-1.909) 0.955 0.939 (0.492-1.791) 0.848 0.963 (0.499-1.860) 0.911 0.804 (0.410-1.575) 0.525
+++ 1.304(1.034-2.276) 0.033 1.124 (0.749-1.686) 0.573 1.604 (1.077-2.388) 0.020 1.185 (0.785-1.788) 0.420
BMI
Normal weight 1 (Reference) 1 (Reference) 1 (Reference) 1 (Reference)
Underweight 1.501(0.970-2.324) 0.068 1.467(0.940-2.291) 0.092 1.557(1.003-2.416) 0.048 1.610(1.028-2.523) 0.037
Overweight 1.676(1.083-2.595) 0.021 1.457(0.931-2.281) 0.099 1.611 (1.024-2.535) 0.039 1.383(0.871-2.196) 0.169

*Statistically significant prognostic factor identified by Univariate/Multivariate analysis