Table 4.
Trait | Method | r | -2LogL difference* | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MAX | 0.151 ± 0.034 | — | — | 1.285 ± 0.034 | 0.11 ± 0.02 | 0.11 ± 0.02 | 0 | |
0.117 ± 0.025 | — | — | 1.316 ± 0.029 | 0.08 ± 0.02 | 0.08 ± 0.02 | 1 | ||
0.143 ± 0.028 | — | — | 1.307 ± 0.028 | 0.10 ± 0.02 | 0.10 ± 0.02 | 35 | ||
0.119 ± 0.024 | — | — | 1.326 ± 0.028 | 0.08 ± 0.02 | 0.08 ± 0.02 | 1 | ||
LMO | 16.06 ± 1.99 | 17.32 ± 1.82 | — | 195.00 ± 1.80 | 0.15 ± 0.01 | 0.07 ± 0.01 | 23 | |
13.45 ± 1.44 | 18.75 ± 1.49 | — | 195.71 ± 1.82 | 0.14 ± 0.01 | 0.06 ± 0.01 | 20 | ||
13.78 ± 1.43 | 19.34 ± 1.44 | — | 195.80 ± 1.82 | 0.15 ± 0.01 | 0.06 ± 0.01 | 0 | ||
13.62 ± 1.43 | 19.34 ± 1.45 | — | 195.82 ± 1.82 | 0.14 ± 0.01 | 0.06 ± 0.01 | 3 | ||
FRT | 5.31 ± 1.59 | 3.89 ± 2.47 | 11.95 ± 1.42 | 466.06 ± 4.24 | 0.043 ± 0.001 | 0.011 ± 0.001 | 1 | |
3.36 ± 1.59 | 5.41 ± 2.29 | 11.91 ± 1.41 | 466.22 ± 4.24 | 0.043 ± 0.006 | 0.007 ± 0.002 | 0 | ||
3.05 ± 0.97 | 5.95 ± 2.28 | 11.90 ± 1.41 | 466.22 ± 4.24 | 0.043 ± 0.006 | 0.006 ± 0.002 | 4 | ||
2.92 ± 0.93 | 6.05 ± 2.28 | 11.89 ± 1.41 | 466.22 ± 4.24 | 0.043 ± 0.005 | 0.006 ± 0.002 | 5 |
1MAX, maximum cycle number; LMO, litter mortality; FRT, farrowing rate; , inverted pedigree relationship matrix; , inverted from the full genomic relationship matrix (G); , inverted from the full G with metafounder included in ; , approximation based on recursion of core animals in G.
*Difference between maximum likelihood function of the model fitted and the lowest value obtained for the trait (MAX: 18,619; LMO: 265,007; FRT: 300,766), where a smaller value indicates a better fit.