Skip to main content
. 2020 Jan 23;214(3):669–690. doi: 10.1534/genetics.119.302860

Table 5. Enrichment analysis of LIN-29 target genes.

All LIN-29-regulated targets (n = 1101) Gene count
Category/GO term In genome Found Expected Fold P value
GO biological process Peroxisome organization 18 7 0.97 7.23 1.89E−04
Fatty acid metabolic process 105 21 5.65 3.72 1.56E−06
Defense response to Gram-positive bacterium 60 12 3.23 3.72 2.65E−04
Innate immune response 345 57 18.56 3.07 2.55E−12
Oxidation-reduction process 618 60 33.25 1.8 3.76E−05
Cellular response to chemical stimulus 612 57 32.92 1.73 1.57E−04
GO molecular function Structural constituent of cuticle 168 48 9.04 5.31 2.90E−18
Iron ion binding 118 20 6.35 3.15 2.38E−05
Oxidoreductase activity 539 56 29 1.93 1.08E−05
GO cellular component Peroxisomal membrane 18 8 0.97 8.26 3.08E−05
Membrane raft 80 14 4.3 3.25 2.87E−04
Extracellular space 294 37 15.82 2.34 7.31E−06
Lipid metabolisma N/A 471 65 25.33 2.56 1.72E−12
1.7-fold upregulated targets (n = 230) Gene count
Category/GO term In genome Found Expected Fold P value
GO molecular function Structural constituent of cuticle 168 33 1.9 17.36 5.46E−29
Lipid metabolisma N/A 471 2 5.29 0.94 6.84E−02
1.7-fold downregulated targets (n = 350) Gene count
Category/GO term In genome Found Expected Fold P value
GO biological process Fatty acid metabolic process 105 11 1.79 6.16 3.99E−06
Innate immune response 345 18 5.87 3.07 4.40E−05
GO cellular component Peroxisomal membrane 18 5 0.31 16.34 3.33E−05
Lipid metabolisma N/A 471 25 8.05 3.11 4.61E−07

Enrichment analyses were done for all LIN-29 significant targets and for both 1.7-fold LIN-29 up- and downregulated subsets using Gene Ontology (GO) Consortium (see Materials and Methods).

a

Genes were also compared to the list of 471 C. elegans metabolic genes from Y. Zhang et al. (2013).