Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 Jun 1.
Published in final edited form as: Monogr Soc Res Child Dev. 2019 Jun;84(2):7–147. doi: 10.1111/mono.12405

Table 7.2.

GLME results for the relation between ALAR (time t) and proximity to the anti-phase pattern (time t + 500 ms) when considering only t’s on which the proximity was below 0.5 (at least 90° far from the 180° pattern).

R2 = 0.11 df = 1.30*105
Fixed Effects
Name Estimate (± SE)a t-stat p-value
Interceptb −1.00 (± 0.13) 7.46 < .001
Change (per month) 0.01 (± 0.01) 1.06 .287
ALAR 0.24 (± 0.08) 3.04 .002
No-Model −0.37 (± 0.02) 20.25 < .001
In-Phase Model −0.42 (± 0.02) 19.44 < .001
Change*ALAR 0.01 (± 0.002) 6.91 < .001
Change*No-Model 0.02 (± 0.003) 5.90 < .001
ALAR*No-Model 0.10 (± 0.02) 5.57 < .001
Change*In-Phase Model 0.007 (± 0.003) 2.34 .019
ALAR*In-Phase Model 0.15 (± 0.02) 6.80 < .001
Change*ALAR*No-Model −0.01 (± 0.003) 4.46 < .001
Change*ALAR*In-Phase Model −0.03 (± 0.003) 8.97 < .001
Random Effects
Name Type Estimate
Intercept SD 0.35
Change (per Month) SD 0.02
ALAR SD 0.21
Residual SD 0.17
a

The estimates are not the proximity variable directly. This can be obtained by plugging these estimates into the logistic function.

b

The intercept refers to the estimate for the 15th month of age.