Skip to main content
. 2020 Mar 2;86(6):e02873-19. doi: 10.1128/AEM.02873-19

TABLE 3.

Average nucleotide identity and digital DNA-DNA hybridization values among the type and/or representative strains of different lineages defined within the genus Clavibactera

No. Taxon Strain ANIb (lower diagonal) or dDDH (upper diagonal) (%)
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17
1 C. michiganensis sensu stricto LMG 7333T 57.70 58.70 48.00 48.60 49.70 48.00 49.80 49.50 44.80 43.10 40.20 40.00 37.50 37.20 36.80 34.60
2 C. michiganensis subsp. californiensis CFBP 8216T 95/95/95 57.80 46.40 47.90 48.60 47.40 48.10 47.90 44.80 43.70 40.50 40.40 38.50 38.40 38.00 35.70
3 Clavibacter sp. LMG 26808 95/94/95 94/95/95 45.80 47.80 48.40 47.10 47.90 47.70 44.30 42.60 39.60 39.50 37.10 37.00 36.40 34.50
4 C. sepedonicus ATCC 33113T 92/92/92 92/92/92 92/92/92 45.10 46.20 45.20 47.00 46.60 43.90 42.30 39.10 39.10 36.40 36.20 36.00 34.00
5 C. insidiosus LMG 3663T 93/93/93 93/93/93 92/92/93 92/92/92 64.60 59.90 51.20 51.00 47.10 43.30 40.50 40.20 37.90 37.40 37.20 34.80
6 Clavibacter sp. CFBP 7494 93/93/93 92/93/93 93/92/93 92/92/92 96/96/96 60.20 52.20 52.10 46.00 44.10 40.70 40.60 38.10 37.60 37.50 34.90
7 C. nebraskensis NCPPB 2581T 92/93/92 92/93/92 92/92/92 92/92/92 95/95/95 95/95/95 51.40 51.10 45.30 43.30 40.70 40.70 37.70 37.20 36.90 34.90
8 C. michiganensis subsp. chilensis CFBP 8217T 93/93/93 93/93/93 92/93/93 92/93/92 93/93/93 93/93/94 93/93/93 87.50 47.00 45.80 43.40 42.90 40.20 39.50 39.20 37.10
9 C. michiganensis subsp. phaseoli CFBP 8627T 93/93/93 93/93/93 92/92/93 92/93/92 93/93/93 93/93/93 93/93/93 99/99/99 47.10 45.70 43.30 42.90 40.00 39.50 39.10 37.00
10 Clavibacter sp. CFBP 8615 92/92/92 92/92/92 91/92/92 91/92/92 92/92/92 92/92/92 92/92/92 92/92/92 92/93/92 48.00 40.90 40.50 38.20 37.60 37.70 35.80
11 Clavibacter sp. CFBP 8019 91/92/91 91/92/91 91/91/91 91/92/91 91/92/91 91/91/91 91/91/91 92/92/92 92/92/92 93/93/93 40.10 40.00 36.90 36.80 36.80 34.40
12 C. capsici PF008T 90/91/90 90/91/91 90/90/90 90/91/90 90/91/90 90/90/90 90/91/90 91/92/91 91/92/91 90/91/91 90/91/90 58.50 38.40 38.50 37.70 34.50
13 Clavibacter sp. CF11 90/90/90 90/90/90 90/90/90 90/90/90 90/90/90 91/90/90 91/90/90 91/91/91 91/91/91 90/90/90 90/90/90 95/95/95 38.10 38.50 37.60 34.40
14 C. tessellarius ATCC 33566T 90/90/89 90/91/90 89/89/89 89/90/89 90/90/89 90/90/90 90/90/89 91/91/90 91/91/90 90/90/90 89/90/89 90/91/90 90/90/90 49.00 57.70 33.50
15 Clavibacter sp. DOAB 609 89/89/89 89/90/90 89/89/89 89/89/89 89/89/89 90/90/89 89/89/89 90/90/90 90/90/90 89/90/89 89/89/89 90/90/90 90/90/90 93/93/93 47.20 33.60
16 Clavibacter sp. CFBP 8017 89/89/89 89/90/90 89/89/89 89/89/89 89/89/89 90/90/89 89/89/89 90/90/90 90/90/90 89/90/89 89/89/89 90/90/89 90/90/89 95/95/95 92/92/92 33.30
17 Clavibacter sp. CASJ009 88/89/89 89/90/88 88/88/88 88/89/88 88/89/88 88/88/88 88/89/88 89/90/89 89/90/90 89/90/89 88/89/88 88/89/89 88/88/88 88/89/88 88/88/87 87/88/87
a

A combination of ANI and dDDH indices was used to designate a taxonomic status for a given phylogenetic clade, where the “new species” status was assigned to a clade only when both the ANI and dDDH values were below the accepted thresholds (≤95% and ≤70% for ANI and dDDH, respectively [21]).

b

ANI values were calculated using three different algorithms, i.e., JSpeciesWS, ANI calculator, and OrthoANIu, which are presented from left to right, respectively.