Table 5.
Aesthetic complication rate according to the fracture type
Fracture type | No. of patients | Complication type |
Total (%) | p-valuea) | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Deviated nose | Hump nose | Saddle nose | ||||
Am | 8 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 (33.33) | |
As | 13 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 4 (30.77) | |
Bm | 7 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
Bs | 24 | 5 | 0 | 1 | 6 (25.00) | |
C | 9 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 (11.11) | |
Total (%) | 61 (100) | 12 (19.67) | 1 (1.64) | 1 (1.64) | 14 (22.95) | 0.381 |
Values are presented as number or number (%).
Am, unilateral fracture without septal fracture or prominent septal deviation; As, unilateral fracture with septal fracture or prominent septal deviation; Bm, bilateral fracture without septal fracture or prominent septal deviation; Bs, bilateral fracture with septal fracture or prominent septal deviation; C, comminuted fracture.
Kruskal-Wallis test.