Table 5.
Variable‡ | LL (reference) | LH | HL | HH | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
β | β | 95 % CI | P | β | 95 % CI | P | β | 95 % CI | P | |
Log-BMI (kg/m2) | 1·00 | −0·004 | −0·02, 0·01 | 0·569 | −0·001 | −0·01, 0·01 | 0·863 | 0·001 | −0·02, 0·03 | 0·912 |
Log-WC (cm) | 1·00 | −0·011 | −0·05, 0·03 | 0·597 | 0·001 | −0·01, 0·01 | 0·806 | 0·008 | −0·02, 0·04 | 0·552 |
Log-HDL (mg/dl) | 1·00 | −0·047 | −0·17, 0·08 | 0·420 | 0·022 | −0·02, 0·07 | 0·309 | −0·012 | −0·10, 0·07 | 0·753 |
LDL (mg/dl) | 1·00 | 7·337 | −1·22, 15·89 | 0·085 | 1·951 | −3·26, 7·16 | 0·423 | 1·780 | −3·88, 7·44 | 0·500 |
Log-TC (mg/dl) | 1·00 | 0·030 | −0·01, 0·07 | 0·098 | 0·017 | −0·01, 0·04 | 0·194 | 0·015 | −0·03, 0·06 | 0·479 |
Log-TAG (mg/dl) | 1·00 | 0·035 | −0·03, 0·10 | 0·257 | 0·011 | −0·04, 0·06 | 0·602 | 0·024 | −0·11, 0·15 | 0·683 |
Log-FBG (mg/dl) | 1·00 | 0·005 | −0·01, 0·01 | 0·318 | 0·002 | −0·01, 0·02 | 0·766 | −0·003 | −0·03, 0·02 | 0·796 |
Log-SUA (mg/dl) | 1·00 | 0·054 | 0·00, 0·10 | 0·034 | 0·022 | −0·01, 0·06 | 0·181 | 0·048 | −0·02, 0·11 | 0·133 |
LL, low tea (<7 times/week) and low soda/sports drink intake (<4·5 times/week); LH, low tea (<7 times/week) and high soda/sports drink intake (≥4·5 times/week); HL, high tea (≥7 times/week) and low soda/sports drink intake (<4·5 times/week); HH, high tea (≥7 times/week) and high soda/sports drink intake (≥4·5 times/week); WC, waist circumference; TC, total cholesterol; FBG, fasting blood glucose; SUA, serum uric acid.
β-Coefficients are linear regression coefficients derived from multivariable linear regression analyses. All models were adjusted for survey year, age, sex, metabolic equivalent per week (in kJ/kg per h) and total energy intake (in kJ).
This Table presents results without adjusting for total energy intake. The adjusted analyses were carried out and resulted in similar coefficients.
Apart from LDL, other variables were all log transformed due to lack of a normal distribution.