Skip to main content
. 2020 Feb 26;11:31. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2020.00031

TABLE 2.

Lung functional characteristics of the 89 enrolled children.

Functional characteristics Non asthmatic SCD N = 30 (group 1) Asthmatic SCD N = 30 (group 2) Asthma without SCD N = 29 (group 3) P Value Intergroup Comparisons#
Baseline lung function
FEV1; L 2.17 [1.65; 2.64] 1.97 [1.55; 2.38] 2.06 [1.83; 2.50] 0.383
FEV1, % predicted 101 [85; 106] 88 [78; 97] 100 [92; 105] 0.003 2 < 1 = 3
FEV1 z-score +0.07 [−1.17; +0.46] −0.89 [−1.65; −0.26] +0.00 [−0.60; +0.50] 0.003 2 < 1 = 3
FVC, L 2.34 [1.94; 2.93] 2.28 [1.87; 2.75] 2.49 [2.22; 3.01] 0.334
FVC, % predicted 99 [86; 105] 95 [84; 102] 105 [99; 118] 0.001 1 = 2 < 3
FVC, z-score −0.08 [−1.15; +0.41] −0.43 [−1.24; +0.16] +0.40 [−0.05; +1.44] 0.001 1 = 2 < 3
FEV1/FVC 0.89 [0.86; 0.90] 0.84 [0.80; 0.86] 0.83 [0.79; 0.86] 0.001 1 > 2 = 3
FEV1/FVC, z-score −0.00 [−0.44; +0.53] −0.71 [−1.25; −0.29] −0.99 [−1.57; −0.25] 0.001 1 > 2 = 3
Exhaled NO*
Calv,NO, ppb (n = 83) 3.2 [2.3; 5.3] 3.4 [1.6; 5.4] 7.1 [3.3; 11.4] 0.003 1 = 2 < 3
J’aw,N0, nL/min (n = 83) 22 [16; 35] 16 [9; 46] 57 [24; 104] 0.001 1 = 2 < 3
FENO005,Ppb (n = 89) 10.3 [6.9; 15.0] 8.0 [5.4; 18.8] 20.8 [13.8; 34.5] 0.001 1 = 2 < 3
Post-bronchodilator
FEV1 L 2.18 [1.73; 2.69] 2.07 [1.70; 2.45] 2.19 [1.92; 2.64] 0.425
FEV1, % predicted 104 [89; 109] 94 [87; 103] 108 [102; 117] 0.001 1 = 2 < 3
FEV1, z-score +0.30 [−0.86; +0.64] −0.49 [−1.03; +0.24] +0.63 [+0.15; +1.33] 0.001 1 = 2 < 3
Bronchodilator response, % +3 [−1; +5] +4 [+2; +9] +7 [+3; +12] 0.004 1 < 2 = 3
FVC, L 2.40 [1.97; 2.85] 2.29 [1.98; 2.74] 2.51 [2.27; 3.15] 0.277
FVC, % predicted 100 [86; 107] 96 [86; 104] 110 [102; 117] 0.001 1 = 2 < 3
FVC, z-score +0.02 [−1.09; +0.51] −0.34 [−1.11; +0.32] +0.77 [+0.15; +1.33] 0.001 1 = 2 < 3
FEV1/FVC, 0.91 [0.88; 0.92] 0.88 [0.84; 0.91] 0.86 [0.83; 0.90] 0.005 1 > 2 = 3
FEV1/FVC, z-score +0.47 [−0.25; +0.73] +0.05 [−0.52; +0.36] −0.36 [−0.74; +0.16] 0.008 1 > 2 = 3

*Alveolar NO concentration (Calv,NO) and maximum NO flux from bronchial tree (J’aw,NO) were not obtained in six subjects in whom the linearity of the relationship between the exhaled NO flux and expiratory rate was not observed (failure of the model) (Mahut et al., 2006). #Post hoc two-group comparisons were performed using the Mann–Whitney U test or the chi-square test, as appropriate (see section “Materials and Methods”). For additional lung function tests, see Table A1.